Background to this inspection
Updated
11 February 2023
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.
As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.
Inspection team
The inspection team consisted of 2 inspectors.
Service and service type
Regus House is a supported living service. It provides personal care to children and young adults living in their own houses and flats so they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.
Registered Manager
This service is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was announced. Inspection activity started on 6 December 2022 and ended on 8 December 2022. We visited the location's office on 6 December 2022.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since it was last inspected. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return (PIR). This is information providers are required to send us annually with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make.
During the inspection
We spoke with 1 person's relative and 3 health and social care professionals involved with the person's care and support. We also spoke with 7 staff members including the director, the registered manager, a compliance manager, care staff and the nominated individual. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider.
We reviewed 1 person's care file and records, 3 staff recruitment files, staff training and a range of management records including staff training, quality assurance records and key policies and procedures.
Updated
11 February 2023
About the service
Regus House, Headzpace, provides personal care and support to children and young adults in their own homes and flats within the community. Many of the young people have learning disability, autism or both and/or mental health needs.
Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection, there were 7 people using the service, 1 person was using the regulated activity of personal care.
We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. 'Right support, right care, right culture' is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.
People's experience of using this service and what we found
Right Support: Staff gave people care and support in a safe environment. Risks to people's health and safety were managed without compromising their independence. We have made a recommendation about positive behaviour support planning. There were enough staff to make sure people received care and support when they needed it. Staff were trained and supported to carry out their job safely and effectively. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
Right Care: The care was person-centred and promoted people's human rights. People's needs were appropriately assessed before they moved to the service. The service worked together with health and social care professionals and relatives to ensure people's needs could be met and their health and well-being maintained. Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. Staff were appropriately trained on how to recognise and report abuse and they knew how to report safeguarding concerns.
Right Culture: The provider promoted a person-centred environment and people experienced good outcomes. Relatives spoke positively about the management team and staff. People received good quality care, and support because trained staff could meet their needs and wishes. Staff understood people's needs in relation to their strengths, impairments or sensitivities people with a learning disability and/or autistic people may have. This enabled people to receive compassionate and empowering care that was tailored to their needs. Staff knew and understood people well and were responsive, supporting their aspirations to live a quality life of their choosing. The management team were committed to the continuous improvement of the service. We have made a recommendation that the provider review and develop their restraint policy to ensure this is sufficiently robust and in line with current guidance.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection and update
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of this service on 16 March 2022. Breaches of legal requirements were found under safe care and treatment and good governance. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was no longer in breach of regulations.
Why we inspected
We undertook this focused inspection to check they had followed their action plan and to confirm they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to the Key Questions Safe, Effective and Well-led which contain those requirements. For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating. The overall rating for the service has remained requires improvement This is based on the findings at this inspection.
This service has been in Special Measures since 23 December 2021. During this inspection the provider demonstrated that improvements have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.
You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Regus House on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.