Background to this inspection
Updated
6 August 2022
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type
No 19 Respite House is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing and/or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
Registered Manager
This service is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided. At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was unannounced.
What we did before the inspection
We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return (PIR). This is information providers are required to send us annually with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. We also looked at statutory notifications we had received. These are events or important information that the service must tell us about, by law.
During the inspection
We spent time with and spoke with two people living at the service and the relative of the third person. Two members of staff, the registered manager and the nominated individual / owner of IOTA Care Limited. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider. To help us assess and understand how people's care needs were being met we reviewed three people's care records. We also reviewed records relating to the running of the service. These included staff recruitment and training records, medicine records and records associated with the provider's quality assurance systems.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at training data and quality assurance records. We spoke with two relatives and one healthcare professional.
Updated
6 August 2022
About the service
No 19 Respite House, known as No 19, is a respite service for adults with learning disabilities and/or autistic people. It is registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide accommodation and personal care for up to three people at any one time. At the time of the inspection there were three people staying at the service.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.
Right support: Model of care and setting maximises people’s choice, control and Independence.
People were able to choose how they spent their time and were supported by staff to take part in activities and pursue their interests in their local area/community. People were supported and encouraged to be independent and staff had a good awareness of people's needs and preferences. However, we found more work was needed to embed the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).
Right care: Care is person-centred and promotes people’s dignity, privacy and human rights.
Staff knew people well and understood how to communicate effectively with people. Staff spoke to people in a dignified and respectful way and it was clear from our observations that people and staff had developed good relationships. However, people’s care and support plans were not always reflective of their range of needs.
Right culture: The ethos, values and attitudes of managers and staff helped to ensure people using services were enabled to lead confident, inclusive and empowered lives. The registered manager and staff spoke passionately about promoting people's wellbeing, safety, and security. Staff understood their role in making sure that people came first, and their care and support was tailored to their individual needs and preferences.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection
This service was registered with us on 03 July 2020 and this is the first rating inspection.
Why we inspected
This was a planned inspection for a newly registered service.
Enforcement and Recommendations
We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to monitor the service and will take further action if needed.
We have identified breaches in relation to safe care and treatment and governance at this inspection. We have also made recommendations in relation to deprivation of liberties safeguards (DoLS) and staff induction.
Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.
Follow up
We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.