The inspection took place on 9 August 2016. This was an announced inspection. We gave the provider 48 hours notice of the inspection as this is a domiciliary care agency and we wanted to ensure the registered manager was available in the office to meet us. We last inspected the service on 9 January 2014. At this inspection, we found the provider to be compliant.
Barnet Mencap - 35 Hendon Lane is a short break respite service run by Barnet Mencap. The service provides support for children and young adults when parents require a short break. The service includes personal care, therapeutic and social activities both in people’s own homes and in their local community. The service provided a range of support to people through a number of hours per week contracts. Barnet Mencap runs another service Sherrick House that provides respite care home service to people with a learning and or physical disability. Staff worked across both services. At the time of this inspection, Barnet Mencap - 35 Hendon Lane domiciliary service provided support to five people with a learning disability but only one person was receiving support with personal care. Three members of staff were delivering support but only one staff was delivering regulated activity.
The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People using the service and their relatives told us they found staff friendly and kind. They told us that their health and care needs were met. People’s relatives told us that staff listened to them and that their family member’s health and care needs were met. They told us their family members were treated with respect and staff engaged with them in a friendly and considerate manner. Staff understood people’s needs and preferences.
Care plans were detailed and recorded individual needs, likes and dislikes. Risk assessments were individualised and detailed information on safe management of the risks. Care plans and risk assessments were regularly updated and reviewed. There were clear records of care delivery.
Staff were able to demonstrate their role in raising concerns and protecting people from harm and abuse. Staff had a good understanding of the safeguarding procedure and the role of external agencies.
Staff files had records of application forms, interview notes and reference checks. The service renewed the criminal record checks of staff every three years. Staff told us they were supported well and we saw records of staff supervision and appraisal. Staff told us they attended induction training and additional training, and records confirmed this.
The service had systems and processes in place to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of service provided. There was evidence of regular monitoring checks of the service.