Background to this inspection
Updated
12 October 2023
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by 1 inspector.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.
Registered Manager
This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run, for the quality and safety of the care provided and compliance with regulations.
At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 24 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because it is a small service and we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.
What we did before inspection
We reviewed information we already held about the service. We sought feedback from the local authority who work with the service. The provider was not asked to complete a Provider Information Return (PIR) prior to this inspection. A PIR is information providers send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We used all this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
During the inspection we spoke 1 person who used the service. We spoke with 3 staff, the registered manager, deputy manager and a care assistant. We reviewed a range of records. This included 1 person’s care records. We looked at 2 staff files in relation to recruitment. A variety of records relating to the management of the service were reviewed, including various policies and procedures.
Updated
12 October 2023
About the service
BK Social Care is a domiciliary care agency providing the regulated activity of personal. The service provides support to older and younger adults with physical disabilities and dementia. At the time of our inspection there was 1 person using the service.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
People told us they were happy with the service. A person said, “They are good, they look after me the way I should be looked after. They are helpful, they are compassionate.”
Systems were in place to help safeguard people from abuse. Risk assessments were in place which set out the risks people faced and included information about how to mitigate those risks. There were enough staff to meet people's needs and robust staff recruitment practices were in place. Steps had been taken to help prevent the spread of infections. Systems were in place for investigating accidents and incidents.
Initial assessments were carried out of people's needs before they started using the service to see if the provider could meet them. Staff received training to support them in their role. People were able to make choices about what they ate and drank.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
People told us that staff were kind and caring and treated them well. People's privacy was respected, and staff understood the importance of maintaining confidentiality.
Care plans were in place which set out how to meet the individual needs of people. People and relatives were involved in developing these plans, which meant they were able to reflect people's needs and preferences. People's communication needs were met. People told us they had confidence that any complaints raised would be addressed.
Quality assurance and monitoring systems were in place to help drive improvements at the service. There was an open and positive culture at the service, which meant people, relatives and staff could express their views. The provider worked with other agencies to develop best practice and share knowledge.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection and update
This service was registered with us on 22 October 2021 and this is the first inspection.
Why we inspected
This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service.
Recommendations
We have made good practice recommendations about obtaining written employment references for staff and keeping records of staff supervision.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.