Background to this inspection
Updated
19 December 2019
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
This inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type
This service provides care and support to people living in specialist ‘extra care’ housing. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted single household accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is rented and is the occupant’s own home. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support service.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was announced. We gave the service 24 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because people are often out, and we wanted to be sure there would be people available to speak with us.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We met with four people who received care from the service. This was to find out about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with six members of staff including the registered manager, area manager and care staff.
We reviewed a range of records. This included three people’s care records and multiple medication records. We looked at three staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.
Updated
19 December 2019
About the service
Colliers Gardens Extra Care is an extra care housing scheme for older people, comprising of individual flats in one large building. The scheme had some communal areas, and an onsite restaurant. People who lived at the service had a separate care and tenancy agreement. At the time of our inspection, the service supported 38 people with personal care. Other people required support with social, domestic visits or welfare calls only.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
Staff received training in how to recognise and report abuse. People confirmed they were happy with the care they received. Appropriate recruitment checks had taken place before staff started work. People told us there were enough staff available to meet their needs. People's medicines were managed safely, and the service had procedures in place to reduce the risk of infection.
Staff had received training to meet the needs of people using the service. They had also received regular supervision and an appraisal of their work performance. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
Staff knew people well and were kind and respected people's privacy and dignity. Positive relationships had been formed between staff and people using the service and people were encouraged to maintain their independence. The management team promoted diversity and inclusion within the service.
The service was responsive to people’s health and social needs. People’s care records were reflective of people's individual care needs and preferences and were reviewed on a regular basis. People knew about the service's complaints procedures and knew how to make a complaint. People were supported and helped to maintain their health and to access health services when they needed them.
Quality monitoring systems were in place, and the provider completed various audits to assist them in monitoring and helping them to identify how to improve people's experiences.
Rating at last inspection: The last rating for this service was good (published May 2017).
Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk