20 January 2014
During a routine inspection
We spoke with two people who used the service and observed the care of others. We also spoke with the manager, assistant manager, two members of staff, one relative and one visiting health care professional.
We saw that staff treated people in a respectful way.
We found the provider protected the rights of people who did not have the capacity to consent, and they acted in accordance with the legal requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA 2005).
One person who used the service told us, 'Nice to live here. They (staff) look after me very good. They are good cooks.' Another person who used the service told us, 'It is very nice living here. It is a nice house. It has been done up.' a relative of a person who used the service told us, 'The care is very good. I can't fault it.'
We saw that all medication was stored securely in locked medicine cabinets and we found there were arrangements in place to protect people against the risks associated with medicines.
We saw that staff meetings were held on a regular basis. However, we found that the provider did not have an effective system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of all aspects of the service.