Somerset House is a three storey property in a residential area of Bolton. The home is close to local amenities and public transport. The home is registered to care for six adults with a mental health difficulties. This was an unannounced inspection that took place on 11 December 2015. We last inspected the home on 23 October 2013. At that inspection we found the service was meeting all the regulations that we reviewed. The home had a registered manager in post. The registered manager was responsible for another two of the company’s homes in the Bolton area. The registered manager assisted with the inspection as did the member of staff on duty. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
Staff recruitment procedures were safe. We saw appropriate checks had been undertaken before staff commenced work at the service to ensure they were suitable to work with vulnerable adults.
We found that suitable arrangements were in place to help safeguard people from abuse and staff? Do people need to be safeguarded from staff?.
Staffing levels were assessed and reviewed depending on what activities or appointments people had and if staff support was required.
Most of the people had lived at the home for a number of years and were happy with support they received.
We found the system for managing medicines were safe, people told us they were happy for staff to administer their medication.
People’s care records contained enough information to guide staff on the support required. All the people who used the service were independent and did not require any help with personal care. Staff encouraged and supported people as required with daily living tasks.
People who used the service were able to make decisions for themselves and were involved and consulted about the development of their care plan.
Food stocks were good and people who used the service were consulted about their preferred choice of food.
Risk assessments were in place for the safety of the premises and equipment.
We saw that people made decisions as to how they spent their day. People sometimes went out to the shops and to local pub.
We found the provider was meeting the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS); these provide a legal framework for people who may lack capacity to make their own decisions for themselves and are helped to do so when needed. There was nobody living at Somerset House who was subject to a DoLs.
The service had an appropriate complaints procedure in place. We looked at the complaints log and saw there had been one complaint in 2015. This had been suitably addressed by the registered manager.
There was a system in place to monitor and assess the quality of the service. These included: satisfaction surveys, medication checks, people’s finances and care records.