• Care Home
  • Care home

Karam Court Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Mallin Street, Highbury Road, Smethwick, West Midlands, B66 1QX (0121) 558 8007

Provided and run by:
Minster Care Management Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 9 October 2019

The inspection:

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team

The inspection was completed by one inspector, and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of service.

Service and service type

Karam Court Care Home is a care home. People in care homes receive accommodation and personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during the inspection.

There was a registered manager in post. This means that the provider and the registered manager are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

This inspection was unannounced and took place on 10 September 2019.

What we did before the inspection

We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We also reviewed feedback available through Healthwatch. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England. We used all this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection:

We looked at information we held about the service, including notifications they had made to us about important events. We reviewed information we hold since the last inspection. We used information the provider had sent to us in the providers information return (PIR). This is information the provider sends to us which contains key information about their service, what they do well and improvement they plan to make. This information helps to support our inspection. We used the Short Observation Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

We spoke with seven people using the service. Some people were living with dementias so could not talk with us. We spoke with five relatives to ask about their experience of the care provided to their relatives. We spoke with the registered manager, area manager and two staff. We looked at the care records for four people, three staff employment related records and records relating to the quality and management of the service.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. The registered manager sent us further documentation to support the inspection.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 9 October 2019

About the service:

Karam Care is a care home providing personal care and support to 47 people. At the time of the inspection 45 people were living there some of whom were living with dementia. The accommodation is provided over two floors, with a communal area on each floor.

People’s experience of using this service:

People were kept safe and secure from the risk of harm. Potential risks to people’s health had been assessed and managed well.

People received their medication safely and as prescribed. People were supported by staff that had been safely recruited and had the relevant training to support people safely.

People’s choices and independence was respected and promoted.

Staff responded to people’s care needs and external healthcare professionals were involved when needed.

People’s relatives were confident about approaching the registered manager If they had any concerns.

The provider had effective auditing systems in place to monitor the effectiveness and quality of the service provided. People’s views on the quality of the service was gathered and used to improve and develop the service.

Rating at last inspection:

The last rating for the service was good (published 14 March 2017)

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the rating at the last inspection.

Follow up:

We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received, we may inspect sooner.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk