We spoke with five people who used the service, the registered manager and three staff members. We looked at four people's care records and also looked at other records including quality audits and health and safety checks. During our inspection and through analysis of our inspection findings we considered the questions we always ask, is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led?
This is a summary of what we found
Is the service safe?
We found that the service was safe. When we arrived our identification was checked and we were asked to sign the visitor's book. This showed that the staff took the security of the building and the safety of the people who lived there seriously.
When we spoke with people they told us they felt safe living in the service and that they would speak with the staff if they had concerns.
We examined medication records, how the medication was stored and observed the way medication was administered to people. We found that the medication was managed and administered in a way that ensured peoples safety and wellbeing.
We found that staff received appropriate training, professional development and supervision. We saw that there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs.
We saw records which showed that health and safety checks were carried out in the service regularly and action was taken if equipment was found to be faulty or unsafe. This included regular visual checks and servicing of equipment such as hoists, the fire alarm panel and wheelchairs. Regular fire safety and legionella tests and checks were carried out, which showed that people were protected from unsafe or poorly maintained equipment.
We saw that the staff were provided with training in safeguarding vulnerable adults from abuse, the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). This meant that staff were provided with the information that they needed to ensure that people were safeguarded.
Is the service effective?
The people we spoke with told us that they were happy living in the service, one person told us, 'I like it here, nothing is too much trouble.' During our observations of the care and support staff gave to people, we saw that the service was effective in meeting people's needs.
People's care records showed that care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure their safety and welfare. The records were regularly reviewed and updated which meant that staff were provided with up to date information about how people's needs were to be met.
We saw that the service was effective in assessing people's nutritional needs and offered a good and varied menu, while ensuring that health needs and preferences were met.
Is the service caring?
We saw that the staff interacted with people who lived in the home in a caring, respectful and professional manner. During the time we spent at the service we saw that people were comfortable, looked smart and that staff were committed to caring for the people they supported.
Before people received any care or treatment they were asked for their consent and the provider acted in accordance with their wishes. People told us that the staff listened to their choices and acted on what they said. One person said, 'I do what I want to.' Another person told us that, 'I'm treated well, I get up when I want to and go to bed when I choose.'
The people we did speak with told us that they found the staff friendly and caring. One person told us, 'They (the staff) are genuinely caring and relaxed.' Another person said, 'It's lovely here, I have all I want.'
Is the service responsive?
People's care records showed that, where concerns about their wellbeing had been identified, the staff had taken appropriate action to ensure that people were provided with the support they needed. Support and guidance was sought from health care professionals, including the doctor, the speech and language team and the dietician.
The people who used the service and their relatives were given the opportunity to complete annual satisfaction questionnaires. The operations manager said that the service responded to concerns raised with it through the survey. People and their families were also provided with the opportunity to participate in the running of the service by attending house meetings.
Is the service well led?
The service had an effective quality assurance system in place. The records we examined showed that identified shortfalls were addressed promptly. This ensured that the quality of the service was maintained.
The staff we spoke with told us that the manager was supportive, easy to approach and listened to what they had to say. The deputy manager told us that they felt supported by the provider, who is also the manager.