This service is rated as
Good
overall. (Previous inspection 13/02/2014 – inspected but not rated).
The key questions are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? – Good
Are services well-led? – Good
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Sk:n-Sheffield Psalter Lane as part of our inspection programme. The inspection was carried out to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008. The service registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in 2012 and was inspected in 2014 but not rated. This was the first rated inspection of the service.
This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of regulated activities and services and these are set out in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Sk:n-Sheffield Psalter Lane provides a range of non-surgical cosmetic interventions, for example, laser hair removal and anti-ageing injections which are not within CQC scope of registration. Therefore, we did not inspect or report on these services.
Sk:n- Sheffield Psalter Lane is registered with the CQC to provide the following regulated activities:
Diagnostic and screening procedures, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury.
The clinic manager is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
Due to the current pandemic we were unable to obtain comments from patients via our normal process of asking the provider to place comment cards within the service location. However, we saw from internal surveys and on-line feedback reviews that patients were mostly positive about the service, describing staff as professional, kind and caring. We did not speak with patients on the day, as there were none attending for regulated activities.
Our key findings were:
- The provider had systems and processes for monitoring and managing risks.
- Best practice guidance was followed when providing treatment to patients.
- Staff were clear on their roles and responsibilities and had received mandatory training relevant to their role.
- Patient feedback was acted on.
- There was a clear strategy and vision for the service. The leadership and governance arrangements promoted good quality care.
The areas where the provider should make improvements are:
- Review the interpreter system in place for patients whose first language is not English.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care