Boston West Hospital

Updated 23 October 2015

Boston West Hospital is an independent health care, purpose built day case hospital which provides services for assessment, diagnosis and treatment of common surgical conditions. The hospital does not provide overnight care to patients.

Clinical facilities include a main reception, outpatient suite with five consulting/examination/treatment rooms and pre-operative assessment area. The hospital also has counselling facilities. The hospital has one theatre, where a range of surgical procedures and endoscopic (diagnostic) investigations are performed. Post-surgery, patients are transferred to a postoperative recovery room. A three stage Theatre Sterile Services Unit is located at the hospital and provides sterilisation services to the hospital and other locations.

Treatments available at the hospital include endoscopy, colonoscopy, hernia surgery, knee arthroscopy, shoulder arthroscopy, cataract surgery, cystoscopy, hand surgery, foot surgery, minor urology treatments, minor gynaecological treatments, vasectomy, varicose vein surgery, pain management, orthopaedics, and minor skin procedures. Diagnostic imaging is available at the hospital using a portable c-arm x-ray machine.

The hospital provides care and treatment for adults over the age of 18 for NHS, self-funding and insured patients. The majority of patients seen in the service were funded by the NHS using GP patient referrals through ‘Choose and Book.’ Choose and Book is a national electronic referral service which gives patients a choice of place, date and time for their first out-patient appointment in a hospital or clinic.

The hospital delivers day care surgery, assessments and treatments to the residents of Lincolnshire and surrounding areas.

We inspected surgery and outpatients and diagnostic imaging at Boston West Hospital. Our inspection was part of our ongoing programme of comprehensive Independent Health Care inspections.

Updated 23 October 2015

Boston West Hospital is an independent health care, purpose built day case hospital which provides services for assessment, diagnosis and treatment of common medical conditions. The hospital is part of the Ramsay Health Care provider group.

The hospital’s senior management team consisted of a registered manager, matron and medical director who provided professional leadership for all staff.  The chair of the hospital’s local Medical Advisory Committee (MAC) was a member of the provider’s regional MAC.

We inspected the hospital on 28 and 29 April 2015 on an announced visit. On 14 May 2015 we carried out an unannounced inspection of the hospital.

We inspected surgery and outpatients and diagnostic imaging at Boston West Hospital. Our inspection was part of our ongoing programme of comprehensive Independent Health Care inspections.

The overall rating for the hospital was good. We found Surgery services were good in all of the five domains we inspected; Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Outpatients and Diagnostic Imaging services were good in the four domains we inspected; Safe, Caring, Responsive and Well-led.

Are services safe at this hospital?

We found a robust incident reporting system in place at this hospital. Staff knew how to report incidents and were encouraged to do so by their managers. Staff monitored patients before, during and after their procedures and surgery to minimise risks to individual patients. Nursing and surgical staffing were managed effectively to deliver appropriate care to patients.

Are services effective at this hospital?

Evidence based assessment, care and treatment was delivered to patients following national guidance by appropriately qualified and competent staff. Clinical staff maintained professional registrations as required. We found clinical staff had completed mandatory training and had all received annual appraisals. The hospital had an audit programme in place for 2014/15 which included audits of medical records, controlled drugs and medicines management and infection prevention and control. Medical records audit in January 2015 showed 98% compliance. Audits in controlled drugs and medicines management showed 100% compliance in December 2014 and October 2014 respectively. A hand hygiene audit in December 2014 showed 94% compliance.

Are services caring at this hospital?

The care we observed in the hospital was very good. Staff were very attentive and compassionate, with patients being involved at every stage of their treatment. Staff were very proud of the care they delivered and spoke about patients with utmost respect. Patient satisfaction was high with recent data showing that over 90% of outpatients and patients undergoing surgery would recommend the hospital to their family and friends as a place to receive treatment and care.

Are services responsive at this hospital?

We saw the care delivered was very responsive to patients’ needs. The hospital had measures in place to support patient’s differing needs, such as access to interpreters via a telephone interpretation service. The hospital had trained two members of staff to work as dementia champions so they could advise other staff on how best to support people living with dementia. Between October 2014 and February 2015, 100% of patients were seen within the 18 week referral to treatment target. In 2014 the hospital received 10 complaints. We found complaints were taken seriously, with processes in place to learn from them and share this learning with staff.

Are services well-led at this hospital?

The hospital had a robust governance and risk management system in place. Morale was good with staff talking positively about the organisation and their local management team. Engagement at all levels was good with staff feeling listened to and supported. Feedback from patients was encouraged and when feedback rates had dropped, initiatives were put in place to increase it.

Our key findings were as follows:

•  All clinical areas were clean. The hospital had reported no incidence of MRSA, clostridium difficile (C.diff.) or methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) in the reporting period between January to December 2014.
• Best practice infection prevention and control practices were being followed.
• Nursing staffing was managed effectively to ensure patients received safe care with access to consultants obtained in a timely manner. Staffing levels were reviewed daily to enable team leaders in the clinical areas to flex their staffing, according to patient requirements. The hospital had not used any agency staff for the twelve months prior to our visit.
• The provider employed 1.6 whole time equivalent (WTE) consultants in the hospital; an anaesthetist and a surgeon. At least one of the employed consultants was present throughout the hospital’s operating hours. A consultant anaesthetist was present in the hospital for both operating lists each day. This meant they could respond quickly in an emergency and reduce any risk to patients.
• The hospital had not reported any patient deaths between January 2014 and December 2014.  There had been no transfer of care to a nearby trust for patients between January 2014 and December 2014.
• Staff followed guidance on fasting prior to surgery which was based on best practice. For healthy patients requiring a general anaesthetic this allowed them to eat up to six hours prior to surgery and to drink water up to two hours before.
• The hospital provided only day surgery, therefore meals were not provided. A selection of hot drinks and biscuits were available to patients once they had recovered from their procedure and prior to discharge.

We saw several areas of outstanding practice including:

• 100% of staff had completed all mandatory training and appraisals in 2014/15.
• The hospital had been awarded accreditation by the Joint Advisory Group (JAG) on gastrointestinal endoscopy and was the first independent hospital to achieve this.
• The hospital operated a 24 hour telephone helpline run by hospital staff, available to all patients post procedure or operation.

However, there were also areas of poor practice where the trust needs to make improvements.

Importantly, the hospital should:

• The provider should ensure specialist personal protective equipment (PPE) in radiology, including lead aprons, is checked regularly.
• The provider should ensure requests to repair equipment are made, recorded and completed using standard processes and procedures.

Professor Sir Mike Richards

Chief Inspector of Hospitals

Updated 23 October 2015

Overall the outpatients and diagnostic imaging service at the hospital was rated as good. We found that appropriate systems to respond to and learn from incidents were in place, as were systems to help protect people from harm or abuse.

The hospital had access to a radiation protection supervisor and radiation protection adviser in accordance with the ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations and had practices and systems in place in accordance with the legislation.

Patients spoke highly of the care they received and felt involved in and understood their care and treatment. Support was given to patients; both in the out-patient department and via a 24 hour telephone helpline run by hospital staff. Patient satisfaction was high with recent data showing that 90% of outpatients would recommend the hospital to their family and friends as a place to receive treatment and care.

Systems were in place to ensure staff were appropriately qualified to deliver care and treatment. Staff reported that management was supportive and they had access to a wide range of training opportunities to help develop their skills further.

The hospital management encouraged feedback from both patients and staff. Feedback helped inform changes to improve the service. Complaints were taken seriously with processes in place to learn from them and share this learning with staff.

Updated 23 October 2015

Staff demonstrated a good awareness of the process for identifying and recording any safety incidents. Arrangements were in place to minimise risks to patients before and after their procedure. Staffing was managed effectively to ensure patients received safe care with access to consultants obtained in a timely manner.

Staff had undertaken all mandatory training. Records were kept securely and we saw they were accurate, up to date and legible.

Evidence based assessment, care and treatment was delivered to patients following national guidance by appropriately qualified and competent staff. Patients received pain relief appropriate to their needs in a timely manner. Outcomes for patients were monitored on an on-going basis and either met or exceeded the provider’s expected targets.

A multi-disciplinary team approach was in evidence and we observed this throughout our inspection. The percentage of patients who would recommend the hospital for day case surgery varied between 94% and 97%.

The care we observed in the hospital was very good. Patients were not rushed and were treated as individuals. Staff were very attentive and compassionate, with patients being involved at every stage of their treatment. Staff were very proud of the care they delivered and spoke about patients with utmost respect. We saw the care delivered was very responsive to patients’ needs.

Access to care and treatment was monitored and exceeded the national average. The hospital had a robust governance system in place.

Morale was good with staff talking positively about the organisation and their local management team. Engagement at all levels was good with staff feeling listened to and supported.