The Yorkshire Clinic

Updated 13 April 2017

The Yorkshire Clinic is operated by Ramsey Health Care UK Operations Limited. The hospital opened in 1982. It is a private hospital in Bingley, West Yorkshire. The hospital primarily serves the communities of the North and West Yorkshire areas. It also accepts patient referrals from outside these areas.

The hospital provides the following regulated activities:

• Diagnostic and screening procedures
• Surgical procedures
• Treatment of disease, disorder or injury
• Family planning (not inspected or rated)

The hospital has had a registered manager in post since 2010. At the time of the inspection, a new manager had recently been appointed and was registered with the CQC in November 2015.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out the announced part of the inspection on 18 to 20 October 2016, along with an unannounced visit to the hospital on 3 November 2016.

Updated 13 April 2017

The Yorkshire Clinic Hospital is part of the Ramsay Health Care UK Operations Limited. The hospital has 56 beds and 12 ambulatory bays. Facilities include five operating theatres, a four-bed level two care unit, an endoscopy unit, angiography suite, physiotherapy, pharmacy, central sterile services department (CSSD) and X-ray, outpatient and diagnostic facilities. The Lodge is a separate building but still part of the hospital, which has one theatre, consulting and treatment rooms and is the dedicated ophthalmology centre.

The Yorkshire Clinic provides surgery, services for children and young people, and outpatients and diagnostic imaging. We inspected surgery, outpatients and diagnostics and services for children and young people.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out the announced part of the inspection on 18 to 20 October 2016, along with an unannounced visit to the hospital on 3 November 2016.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led? Where we have a legal duty to do so we rate services’ performance against each key question as outstanding, good, requires improvement or inadequate.

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The main service provided by this hospital was surgery. Where our findings on surgery, for example, management arrangements also apply to other services, we do not repeat the information but cross-refer to the core services. See surgery section for main findings.

We rated this hospital as good overall.

We found good practice in relation to surgery, diagnostics and outpatient care and services for children and young people:

• The service managed staffing effectively and services always had enough staff with the appropriate skills, experience and training to keep patients safe and to meet their care needs.
• Staff were encouraged to report incidents and we saw good sharing of learning following incidents. Staff were aware of the two never events and subsequent changes in practice.
• Mandatory training compliance levels were high and we observed good practice in relation to infection prevention and control and medicines.
• Documentation was good and patient care and treatment was evidence based. There were clear pathways of care and staff were able to recognise and respond to signs of deteriorating health.
• Patients were involved in their care and treated with dignity and respect.
• Service provision was focused around the needs of the people using the hospital.
• The provider met national indicators for referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times.
• Staff spoke positively about their leaders and managers.
• The governance arrangements in place ensured that quality, performance and risks were managed.

We found some areas of outstanding practice, these were:

• The pharmacy department had undergone external benchmarking of their aseptic department.
• The new senior children’s nurse was building links to the local authority safeguarding children’s board and had attended a recent link meeting.
• The senior registered sick children’s nurse had started weekly two hour information and advice safeguarding children ‘drop ins’. These had proved popular and provided a link between local and national developments and staff.

There were no breaches of regulations. However, there were areas where the provider should make some improvements, even though a regulation had not been breached, to help the service improve. These were:

• The provider should consider making designated areas more child focused.
• The provider should ensure that all staff receive an annual appraisal.
• The provider should ensure best practice guidance is followed in relation to mental capacity assessment and best interest’s decisions.

Ellen Armistead

Deputy Chief Inspector of Hospitals

Updated 13 April 2017

Children and young people’s services were a small proportion of hospital activity. The main service was surgery. Where arrangements were the same, we have reported findings in the surgery section of the report.

We rated this service as good because it was safe, effective, responsive and well-led. We did not rate the caring domain.  

Updated 13 April 2017

We rated this service as good because it was it was safe, caring, responsive and well-led. We did not rate the effectiveness of the service.

Updated 13 April 2017

Surgery was the main activity of the hospital. Where our findings on surgery also apply to other services, we do not repeat the information but cross-refer to the surgery section.

We rated this service as good because it was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led.

High dependency care services were a small proportion of hospital activity. The hospital has a four-bed high dependency unit providing level 2 care.

The main service was surgery. We have reported any findings specific to high dependency in the surgery section of the report.