Archived: City Health Care Partnership CIC - Beathome

Updated 7 April 2016

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

The inspection was carried out on 9 March 2016 and was led by a CQC Inspector and a specialist advisor.

We informed the NHS England area team and Healthwatch we were inspecting the practice; however we did not receive any information of concern from them.

The methods that were used to collect information at the inspection included interviewing staff, observations and reviewing documents.

During the inspection we spoke with the two dentists, the senior dental nurse, two dental nurses, a receptionist and two operations managers. We saw policies, procedures and other records relating to the management of the service. We reviewed six CQC comment cards that had been completed.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions therefore formed the framework for the areas we looked at during the inspection.

Updated 7 April 2016

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 9 March 2016 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

City Health Care, Pocklington is situated in the centre of Pocklington, East Riding of Yorkshire close to public transport links. The practice has three treatment rooms all on the ground floor, a waiting area, a reception area and a decontamination room. Staff facilities were located on the first floor with offices and a conference room for internal meetings.

There is step free access to the practice and automatic doors to help anyone with mobility requirements. There are three dentists, a senior nurse, a deputy team leader, one dental nurse, a receptionist and a full team of support through the company structure.

The practice is open:

Monday – Thursday 08.30-17.00

Friday 08.30-16.30

The organisation has a designated registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection we received six CQC comment cards providing feedback and spoke with four patients. The patients who provided feedback were very positive about the care and attention to treatment they received at the practice. They told us they were involved in all aspects of their care and found the staff to be caring, attentive, gentle, and helpful and they were treated with dignity and respect in a clean and tidy environment.

Our key findings were:

• Staff had received safeguarding training, knew how to recognise signs of abuse and how to report it. They had very good systems in place to work closely and share information with the local safeguarding team.
• There were sufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff to meet the needs of patients.
• Staff had been trained to manage medical emergencies.
• Patient care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with evidence based guidelines, best practice and current regulations.
• Patients received clear explanations about their proposed treatment, costs, benefits and risks and were involved in making decisions about it.
• Patients were treated with dignity and respect and confidentiality was maintained.
• There was a complaints system in place. Staff recorded complaints and cascaded learning to staff.
• The governance systems were effective.
• The practice sought feedback from staff and patients about the services

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

• Review the practice’s audit protocol of various aspects of the service, such as infection prevention and control and dental care records at regular intervals to help improve the quality of service. The practice should also check all audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.
• Review the practice’s protocol for the recording of fridge temperatures where dental materials are stored.
• Review the practice general risk assessments to ensure they are implemented, available and in place.