Archived: Redlands

Updated 15 April 2015

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 16 and 19 January 2015 and was unannounced.

Before the inspection the provider completed a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We reviewed the information included in the PIR along with information we held about the service. We looked at previous inspection reports and notifications we had received. A notification is information about important events which the service is required to tell us about by law

The inspection was conducted by two inspectors.

We looked at the care records for five people and reviewed the homes quality assurance audits and documentation. We looked at the policies and general information available for people such as safeguarding incidents and feedback questionnaires completed by relatives and professionals. We looked at six staff personnel records including their recruitment and training details.

We spoke with the deputy manager, the assistant area director, four support workers, two healthcare professionals, two people who use the service and three relatives.

At the last inspection on 23 April 2013 we had not identified any concerns with the service.

Updated 15 April 2015

This was an unannounced inspection.

The service provides care and support for up to eight people who have a learning disability, a mental health condition or physical disabilities. Some people using the service displayed behaviours that were challenging to others and required interventions from staff to keep them and others safe.

There is a registered manager at Redlands. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service and has the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law; as does the provider.

The provider monitored incidents where behaviours challenged and responded promptly by informing the local authority safeguarding team, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), behavioural support team and advocacy agencies.

Staff were knowledgeable about the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and worked with advocacy agencies, healthcare professionals and family members to ensure decisions were made in people’s best interests and documented appropriately

People were not deprived of their liberty without authorisation from the local authority. Staff were knowledgeable about the deprivation of liberty safeguards (DoLS) in place for people and accurately described the content detailed in people’s authorisations.

People were protected from possible harm. Staff were able to identify the different signs of abuse and were knowledgeable about the homes safeguarding processes and procedures. They consistently told us they would contact CQC and the local authority if they felt someone was at risk of abuse. Notifications sent to CQC and discussions with the local authority safeguarding team confirmed this.

Staff received training appropriate to people’s needs and were regularly monitored by a senior member of staff to ensure they delivered effective care. Where people displayed physical behaviours that challenged others, staff responded appropriately by using redirection techniques and only used physical intervention as a last resort. The provider had informed the local authority and healthcare professionals when this was applied.

Staff interacted with people and showed respect when they supported them. Relatives and healthcare professionals consistently told us staff engaged with people effectively and encouraged people to participate in activities. People’s records documented their hobbies, interests and described what they enjoyed doing in their spare time.

Staff supported people regularly to attend various health related appointments. Examples of these included visits to see the GP, hospital appointments and assessments with other organisations such as the community mental health team.

People received support that met their needs because staff regularly involved them in reviewing their care plans. Records showed reviews took place on a regular basis or when someone’s needs changed.

There was an open culture where people told us they were encouraged to discuss what was important to them. We consistently observed positive interaction between staff and people. Management audits showed senior staff frequently visited the service to check care and support was delivered to a good standard.