• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Guinness Care Douro Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Douro Court, Brook Road, Ivybridge, Devon, PL21 0LS (01752) 422016

Provided and run by:
The Guinness Partnership Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 30 March 2023

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

This inspection was carried out by one inspector, an assistant inspector and two Expert by Experiences who made telephone calls. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type

This service provides care and support to people living in specialist ‘extra care’ housing. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted single household accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is rented and is the occupant’s own home. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support service.

Registered Manager

This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run, for the quality and safety of the care provided and compliance with regulations.

At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post.

Notice of inspection

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because we needed to be sure that the provider or manager would be in the office to support the inspection.

What we did before the inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We used all this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with 11 people who used the service and 3 relatives about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with 9 members of staff which included care staff, the care coordinator, head of extra care, director of care and the head of quality assurance and service improvement. We reviewed a range of records, this included 4 people’s care records and Medication Administration Records (MAR). We looked at 4 staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management and quality of the service, including policies and procedures.

After the inspection

We requested additional information and continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate the evidence we found.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 30 March 2023

About the service

Guinness Care Douro Court (hereafter called Douro Court) is ‘extra care’ housing. People using the service lived in their own flats in a purpose-built building. CQC does not regulate the premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people's personal care service. The service provided personal care to 22 people at the time of the inspection.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People told us they felt safe and staff understood what to do if they thought someone was at risk of harm or abuse. Safe recruitment processes were in place and staff received induction training and followed a programme of continuous learning as well as regular competency checks to ensure people received safe effective care. There were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people’s needs. Infection prevention and control routines were in place to reduced people’s risk of infection. Medicines were managed safely.

People’s care and support was planned in partnership with them and risk assessments updated accordingly. Feedback from people and their relatives was complementary about the staff.

Systems were in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service. People were provided with the opportunity to feedback on the quality of the service they received, and any suggestions were used to make improvements.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Rating at last inspection

Since the last inspection, the provider had changed their legal entity. The last rating for the service under their previous legal entity was good, published (22/12/2017).

Why we inspected

We carried out this inspection to provide a rating for this provider under their new legal entity.

This is the first inspection of this provider under their new legal entity.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.