01 June 2022
During a routine inspection
Our rating of this location stayed the same. We rated it as good because:
- Staff understood how to protect patients from abuse and the service worked well with other agencies to do so. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse and they knew how to apply it. The service made sure staff were competent for their roles.
- Staff used effective infection control measures.
- The, maintenance of equipment was in place to keep people safe. Staff had access to and completed training to use systems that managed clinical waste well.
- Staff had processes to complete and update risk assessments for each patient. Risk assessments consider patients that might be deteriorating in the last days or hours of their life.
- The service had enough nursing and support staff, with the right qualifications, skills, training and experience to keep patients safe from avoidable harm.
- The service had not had any patient safety incidents. Managers shared lessons learned with the whole team and the wider service.
- Patients could access the specialist palliative care service when they needed it. Waiting times from referral to achievement of preferred place of care and death were in line with good practice.
- Staff from the service worked with other healthcare professionals as a team to benefit patients. They supported each other to provide good care.
- Staff monitored the effectiveness of care and treatment.
- The service provided care and treatment based on national guidance and evidence-based practice.
- Staff supported patients to make informed decisions about their care and treatment.
- Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, and took account of their individual needs.
- Staff supported and involved patients, families and carers to understand their condition and make decisions about their care and treatment.
- The service planned and provided care in a way that met the needs of local people and the communities served. The service took account of patients’ individual needs and preferences. Staff made reasonable adjustments to help patients access services.
- It was easy for people to give feedback and raise concerns about care received.
- Leaders had the skills and abilities to run the service. They understood and managed the priorities and issues the service faced.
- Staff felt respected, supported and valued. However, they were focused on the needs of patients receiving care.
- Leaders operated effective governance processes, throughout the service and with partner organisations.
- Leaders and teams used systems to manage performance effectively. They identified and escalated relevant risks and issues and identified actions to reduce their impact.
- The service collected reliable data and analysed it. Staff could mostly find the data they needed, in easily accessible formats, to understand performance, however improvements to service provision were not always planned. The information systems were integrated and secure. Data or notifications were consistently submitted to external organisations as required.
- Leaders and staff actively and openly engaged with patients, staff, equality groups, the public and local organisations to plan and manage services. They collaborated with partner organisations to help improve services for patients.
However:
- The service provided mandatory training in key skills to all staff but not all staff were up to date.