Updated 4 August 2021
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by one inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes.
The service had a registered manager. This means that they are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
Our inspection was announced. We gave the service notice of the inspection. This was because it is a domiciliary care service and we needed to be sure that a member of the management team would be in the office to support us with the inspection. The registered manager was not available at the time of the inspection. We were supported by the provider’s nominated individual and the interim manager. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider.
What we did before the inspection
The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.
We reviewed the information we already held about this service. This included details of its registration, previous inspection reports and any notifications of significant incidents the provider had sent us. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with the nominated individual and interim manager. We reviewed five care plans, which included risk assessments and four staff files, which included pre-employment checks.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence we found such as risk assessments and policies. We also spoke to four care staff, six relatives of people that used the service and one person. We also contacted professionals that worked with the service for feedback.