Updated 16 May 2019
The inspection:
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team: The inspection consisted on one inspector
Service and service type:
Green Care Contracts Limited is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living within their own homes in the community.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection:
We gave the service notice of the inspection visit because it is small, and the manager is often out of the office supporting staff or providing care. We needed to be sure that they would be in.
Inspection site visit activity started and ended on 05 April 2019. This included visiting the office location to speak with the registered manager, interview staff and to review care records and policies and procedures. After the initial visit we then contacted people and professionals by telephone and email to obtain feedback on the service.
What we did:
Prior to inspection, we reviewed the information we held about the service, including notifications of events the service is required by law to send us. We checked records held at Companies House.
The provider completed a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. The information provided by the provider was used to plan our inspection and considered when we made judgement in this report.
On the day of inspection we reviewed:
• Four people’s care records including medication records
• Four staff files
• Audits and Surveys from the people and their relatives
• Staff training records including supervisions and staff meeting minutes
• Documentation about the management of the service
We spoke with:
• Registered manager
• Office staff
• Two care staff
• Four people who used the service
• Two relatives of people who used the service
• Written feedback from one professional