Updated 2 September 2021
The inspection:
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type:
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses. In the week up until the inspection, the service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This role is important as it means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided. The provider is currently looking for a replacement registered manager.
Notice of inspection:
This inspection was announced. We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because it is a small service and we needed to be sure that the provider or member of the management team would be in the office to support the inspection.
What we did before the inspection:
The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report.
We did look at information we have received regarding this service in the period since the last inspection, including notifications to CQC and safeguarding concerns we have been made aware of.
During the inspection:
We spoke with the nominated individual. We reviewed recruitment records for three staff members, including spot checks and supervision records. We reviewed care records for three people.
After the inspection visit:
We contacted four members of care staff, and received feedback from one person using the service and one relative of a person who used the service.
We also reviewed training information, updated care plans, and policies related to recruitment and complaints. We also received updated recruitment information.
The service received funding for providing care through ’Direct Payments’. Direct Payments is a system that lets you choose and buy the services you need yourself, instead of getting them from your council. This meant the service did not have contact with the commissioners of the service. All interactions with other health and social care professionals was via the person receiving the service or their relatives.