12 July 2018
During a routine inspection
This comprehensive inspection was undertaken on 12 July 2018 following a period of special measures, the practice is now rated as overall good. (Previous rating October 2017 – Inadequate)
The key questions are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? – Requires Improvement
Are services well-led? - Good
We had previously carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Hendon Way Surgery on 11 October 2017. Overall the practice was rated as inadequate and placed in special measures. We identified concerns with regards to safe, effective, responsive and well-led care provided by the practice.
We served warning notices under regulations 17 (good governance) and 18 (staffing) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. The report for the comprehensive inspection can be found by selecting the ‘reports’ link for Hendon Way Surgery on our website at: .
The practice sent us a plan of action to ensure the service was compliant with the requirements of the regulations. We undertook a focussed inspection on 19 March 2018 to review the breaches of regulation identified at the inspection in October 2017 and to ensure the service had made improvements in line with the Warning Notices we had issued. At the focussed inspection we found that the practice was compliant with the regulatory breaches we identified at the comprehensive inspection in October 2017. The report for the focussed inspection can be found by selecting the ‘reports’ link for Hendon Way Surgery on our website at:
This report relates to the follow up comprehensive inspection carried out on 12 July 2018. At the inspection in July 2018 we found that the practice had made significant improvements overall.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
- There was a comprehensive system in place to ensure the safe management of high risk medicines.
- Improvements to governance systems had been made. For example, the practice was able to provide evidence that processes for managing uncollected prescriptions and patient safety alerts had improved and staff were adhering to the revised protocols.
- Systems for managing staff training and induction were significantly improved.
- Patient feedback in relation to GP and Nurse consultations had improved, however patient feedback relating to access to the service was below local and national averages.
- There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
- There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
- The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
- Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
The areas where the provider should make improvements are:
- Improve how patients with caring responsibilities are identified and recorded on the patient record system to ensure information, advice and support is made available to them.
- Continue to review the processes for improving the uptake of child immunisations, cervical screening, bowel cancer screening and breast cancer screening.
- Review processes with a view to improve patient satisfaction around access to the service and clinical consultations with GPs and nurses.
I am taking this service out of special measures. This recognises the significant improvements made to the quality of care provided by the service.
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice