Updated 3 August 2015
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
This inspection took place on 16 June 2015. The provider was given 48 hours’ notice because the location provides a supported living service and we wanted to ensure the registered manager would be there.
The inspection was carried out by one inspector. Prior to the inspection we reviewed the records we held about the service, including the details of any safeguarding events and statutory notifications sent by the provider. Statutory notifications are reports of events that the provider is required by law to inform us about.
Before the inspection, the provider completed a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We looked at the information provided in the PIR and used this to help us plan the inspection.
We contacted two local authority care commissioners’ representatives and received feedback from one of them about the service.
During the inspection we spoke with two staff, the registered manager and deputy manager. We spoke with one person using the service and one relative. The other people using the service were unable to tell us about their experience.
We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us. We reviewed the care plans and associated records for three people, including risk assessments and reviews and
related this to the care observed. We examined a sample of other records to do with the operation of the service including staff records, complaints, surveys and various monitoring and audit tools. We looked at the recruitment records for two recently appointed staff. Following the inspection we spoke with two further relatives to seek their views about the service.