Tenchley Manor Nursing Home is a privately owned service which provides nursing care and accommodation for up to 37 older people. The service offers short and long term placements, including respite care. At the time of our inspection there were 24 people living at the service.
There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
The inspection was unannounced and was carried out on 3 and 5 February 2015.
People told us they felt safe. However, during our inspection we found that risks had not always been identified, which could impact on people’s health and wellbeing.
There were enough staff to meet people’s needs. However, staff were not always supported in carrying out their duties to deliver care and treatment safely. The registered manager’s approach to supervision was inconsistent and essential training was not always refreshed in a timely manner. We have made a recommendation that the provider research and consider adopting the latest research in developing suitable arrangements to ensure that staff were supported in carrying out their duties.
The provider had a process in place to carry out appropriate checks in respect of the recruitment of new staff.
There were appropriate systems in place for the management of medicines. However, there was no guidance to support staff with the administration of ‘when required’ (PRN) medicine. People were also at risk of using topical creams after the ‘use by’ date. We have made a recommendation in respect of PRN guidelines and the management of topical creams.
People were supported to have enough to eat and drink. However, staff were inconsistent in their approach to completing food and fluid charts for people at risk of malnutrition.
Care plans were detailed and reviewed on a monthly basis. However, they did not always reflect people’s current needs. There was a structured approach to activities but this approach was not focussed on individuals and their needs.
The vision and values of the providers are set out in the service user’s guide, which was available to people in their bedrooms rooms. There was an opportunity for people and their relatives to become involved in developing the service. A suggestion box was available on the desk in reception for use by people, their families, visitors and staff.
The audits undertaken by the manager and the providers to monitor the quality of the service provided were not robust and did not ensure the service continually improved.
Staff and the registered manager had received safeguarding training and were able to demonstrate an understanding of the provider’s safeguarding policy and explain the action they would take if they identified any concerns.
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) monitors the operation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which applies to care services. Staff were guided by the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to ensure any decisions were made in the person’s best interests. We found the service to be meeting the requirements of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.
Healthcare professionals such as GPs, chiropodists and Speech and language therapists were involved in people’s care where necessary.
People and their relatives had been involved in the planning and review of their care. Staff used the information contained in the person’s care plan to ensure they were aware of people’s needs. They understood the importance of respecting people’s choice, privacy and dignity. People were encouraged to maintain their family relationships.
Staff had a good knowledge of people, had developed strong friendly relationships with them and were responsive to their needs. Staff interacted with people in a positive and supportive way.
The service was clean and appropriately maintained. All of the bedrooms were individualised and personalised with people’s personal effects. People using the service appeared happy and were relaxed in the company of staff.
People and visiting relatives told us they felt the service was well-led and were positive about the registered manager and the senior nursing team. The provider sought feedback from people or their families and there were arrangements in place to deal with complaints. Accidents and incidents were monitored and remedial actions identified to reduce the risk of reoccurrence.
There were arrangements in place to deal with foreseeable emergencies. A contingency plan had been prepared to ensure care was still provided in the event of disruption to the service.
We found a number of breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010 which correspond with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we have taken at the back of the full version of the report.