Updated 13 June 2019
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection was undertaken by one inspector.
Service and service type:
The service is a Shared Lives scheme. Shared Lives carers provide a family home to people who need care, support and accommodation. Some people need support with their personal care. The Care Quality Commission regulates the care provided to those who have personal care needs only.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Inspection site visit activity started on 7 May 2019 and ended on 9 May 2019.
What we did:
Before the inspection we looked at information we held about the service:
We looked at the last inspection report for the service.
We require providers to send us key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. We call this the Provider Information Return (PIR). This information helps support our inspections. The registered manager completed the PIR which we looked at before we visited the service.
The law requires providers to notify us of certain events that happen during the running of a service. We reviewed notifications received since the last inspection.
During the inspection:
We spoke with three people using the service.
We spoke with four shared lives carers.
We spoke with two shared lives officers and the registered manager.
We looked at the care records for three people.
We looked at other records to do with the running of the service, such as audits and recruitment records.
After the inspection:
We received written feedback from two social care professionals.