• Dentist
  • Dentist

Watling Street Dental Care

56 Watling Street, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 2YN (01634) 576688

Provided and run by:
Dr. Olurotimi Adesanya

All Inspections

27/07/2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Summary We undertook a follow up desk-based review of Watling Street Dental Care on 29 June 2020. This review was carried out to check in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The review was led by a CQC inspector, who had remote access to a specialist dental advisor.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Watling Street Dental Care on 18 December 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well led care and was in breach of regulations 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Watling Street Dental Care on our website .

As part of this review we asked:

•Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met, we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect or review again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the area where improvement was required.

This desk-based review was undertaken during the Covid 19 pandemic. Due to the demands and constraints in place because of Covid 19 we reviewed the action plan and asked the provider to confirm compliance after a reasonable interval, focusing on the area where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 18 December 2019.

Background

Watling Street Dental Care is in Gillingham and provides NHS and private treatment for adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including some for blue badge holders, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes two dentists, five dental nurses, a dental hygienist, a receptionist and a business manager. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed which were sent to us.

The practice is open:

Monday 8.30am to 4.30pm

Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday 8.30am to 5.30pm

Friday 9am to 4.30pm

Saturday by appointment only

Sunday closed

The practice is closed each weekday for lunch.

Our key findings were :

Systems and processes were put in place to assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of service users and others who may be at risk.

18 December 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this unannounced inspection on 18 December 2019 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Watling Street Dental Care is in Gillingham and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes two dentists, five dental nurses (two of which are trainee nurses), a dental hygienist, one receptionist and a business manager. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

We did not provide CQC comment cards to be filled in by patients on this occasion as this was an unannounced inspection.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist and three dental nurses,. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

  • Monday 8.30am to 4.30pm
  • Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Friday 9am to 4.30pm
  • Saturday by appointment only
  • Sunday closed
  • The practice is closed each weekday for lunch.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean, improvements could be made with regard to the maintenance of the building.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements although this required some further work.
  • The provider had some systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff although this requires improvements.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which did not reflect published guidance.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

Full details of the regulation/s the provider was/is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.
  • Review the practice’s infection control procedures and protocols taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance’ In particular: consistency of the storage of instruments.
  • Review the practice’s sharps procedures to ensure the practice is in compliance with the Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013.

27 April 2012

During a routine inspection

The inspection visit was carried out by one Inspector and lasted for three hours. During the visit we (i.e. CQC) talked with four people who were attending for treatment, and with six staff including the principal dentist, who is also the registered provider for the service. He was available throughout the inspection visit.

People attending for treatment made positive comments about the practice, including the following remarks:

'It is always a very good service here. I usually see the same dentist, and he always gives me clear information about what needs doing.'

'I have come in today because I developed toothache yesterday. I have never been here before, but I am glad they have fitted me in so quickly. The dentist saw me within five minutes of arriving today, and I am going to have some treatment when they call me back in from the waiting-room.'

'I have come here as I was not happy with my previous dentist. They seem very helpful, and I am pleased I have come here.'

We also viewed some recent questionnaire responses which included:

'I am very happy with the service by all the staff ' a job well done!'

'The staff are very friendly, and the procedures were explained to me.'