• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Louise Hunter & Associates

34 West Road, Prudhoe, Northumberland, NE42 6HR (01661) 835722

Provided and run by:
Mrs. Louise Hunter

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

16 November 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of Louise Hunter & Associates on 16 November 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Louise Hunter & Associates on 10 May 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well-led care and was in breach of regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Louise Hunter & Associates on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When 1 or more of the 5 questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the area where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 10 May 2022.

Background

Louise Hunter & Associates is in Prudhoe in Northumberland and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

The practice does not have step-free access and is not accessible for people who use wheelchairs; however, patients who require accessible services are directed to other local practices.

The practice is located near local transport routes, and car parking spaces are available nearby.

The provider has made reasonable adjustments to support patients with additional needs, for example a member of staff is trained in British Sign Language and patient information is available in large font.

The dental team includes 3 dentists, 5 dental nurses, 2 trainee dental nurses, 3 dental hygienists, 2 receptionists and a practice manager. The practice has 4 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with a dental nurse, a receptionist and the practice principal. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Mondays from 8am to 5.30pm;

Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays from 8.30am to 6pm;

Fridays from 9am to 5pm.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to implement any recommendations in the practice's Legionella risk assessment, taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.’ In particular, ensure the ongoing monitoring protocols are applied consistently.
  • Improve the system to ensure patient referrals to other dental or health care professionals are centrally monitored to ensure they are securely received in a timely manner.

10 May 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focused inspection on 10 May 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions however, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Safeguarding processes were in place and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The dental clinic was visibly clean and well-maintained; however, improvements could be made to the cleaning equipment storage arrangements.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • Staff and patients were asked for feedback about the services provided.
  • The dental clinic had information governance arrangements.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Medicines and life-saving equipment were available as per national guidance with the exception of a couple of items that the provider obtained on the day.
  • Improvements were needed to the systems used to help the provider manage risks to patients and staff.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation. However, improvements were needed to ensure important checks were carried out at the time of recruitment.
  • The staff carried out some ‘highly recommended’ training as per the General Dental Council professional standards. Improvements were needed to the monitoring system to enable the provider to assure themselves that staff’s training was up-to-date and undertaken at the required intervals.

Background

Louise Hunter & Associates is in Prudhoe in Northumberland and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

The practice does not have step-free access and is not accessible for people who use wheelchairs; however, patients who require accessible services are directed to other local practices. The practice is located near local transport routes, and car parking spaces are available near the practice. The practice has made reasonable adjustments to support patients with additional needs, for example a member of staff is trained in British Sign Language and patient information is available in large font.

The dental team includes three dentists, five dental nurses, two trainee dental nurses, three dental hygienists, two receptionists and a practice manager. The practice has four treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with three dentists, two dental nurses, a receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday from 8am to 5.30pm

Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays from 8.30am to 6pm

Fridays from 9am to 5pm

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

Full details of the regulation the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

11 March 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this inspection to check that improvements had been made in respect of a shortfall identified during our previous visit on 12 September 2013. We spoke with three people who used the service and three staff to obtain their views.

People we spoke with were very satisfied with the service being provided. Their comments included, 'They're lovely; they're very efficient' and 'I don't have the fear I used to have; I feel really confident with her. I would recommend her to anyone.'

We found the necessary improvements had been made. People were cared for by staff who were supported to deliver care safely and to an appropriate standard.

12 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three people to find out their opinions of the dental practice. People were complimentary about the practice and the treatment they had received. One person told us, 'They're very friendly. The work is 'top notch'.' Other comments included, 'It's first class,' 'I couldn't fault them,' "I could not praise them highly enough. I've recommended them to everyone I know," and 'I'm very happy with them.'

We found that people who used the service were provided with information about care and treatment available at the practice.

People were complimentary about the treatment they received. They described the treatment as 'absolutely fantastic' and 'a very pleasant experience.' We concluded that care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare.

People told us that the practice was 'immaculate.' We found that there were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.

People informed us that they thought staff were "well trained." One person said, "I couldn't fault them." This showed that the provider had secured high standards of care by creating an environment in which clinical excellence could do well.

There was an effective system in place to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.