Updated 13 March 2019
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection checked whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team: The inspection team consisted of one inspector.
Service and service type: Woodleigh Healthcare Limited is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats. It provides a personal care to older adults, people living with dementia, people with sensory impairment, younger disabled adults and children.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection: The inspection was announced. We gave the provider 48 hours’ notice because the location provides a domiciliary care service and we needed to be sure someone was available at the office.
What we did: We reviewed the information we held about the service. This included information received from the provider about deaths, accidents/incidents and safeguarding alerts which they are required to send us by law. We also contacted the local authority to gather their feedback about the service. We used information the provider sent us in the Provider Information Return. This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.
We spoke with three relatives of people using the service. We were unable to speak with people using the service. This was because they had limited verbal communication. We also spoke with the registered manager and four members of staff.
We looked at three people’s care records including their daily records and medicines charts. We also examined other records relating to the management and running of the service. These included five staff recruitment files, training records, supervisions and appraisals. We looked at the complaints and quality monitoring information.