• Dentist
  • Dentist

Haydons Road Dental Practice

120 Haydons Road, Wimbledon, London, SW19 1AW (020) 8542 4930

Provided and run by:
Dr. Roksana Islam

All Inspections

11 January 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection of Haydons Road Dental Practice on 11 January 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who had remote access to a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Haydons Road Dental Practice on 21 September 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well led care and was in breach of regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Haydons Road Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 21 September 2021.

The provider had made improvements to put right the shortfalls and had responded to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 21 September 2021.

Background

Haydons Road Dental Practice is in Wimbledon in southwest London and provides NHS treatment for adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice for a fee.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, a locum dentist, two trainee dental nurses and a receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

8.00 to 5.00pm Monday to Thursday

8.00am to 12.00pm Friday and Saturday

Our key findings were:

  • Individual staff records had been developed with all relevant staff recruitment and These folders were readily available.
  • A training matrix had been developed which recorded and tracked all training undertaken by staff in the practice. Certificates were collected and maintained on electronic individual staff folders.
  • Systems were in place so that documents relating to equipment checks, risk assessments and servicing of equipment were stored centrally. Documents were filed in an orderly, accessible way.
  • A legionella risk assessment had been carried out in October 2021. All actions and recommendations from the risk assessment had been completed.

21 September 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 21 September 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions, however due to the ongoing pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Haydons Road Dental Practice is in Wimbledon in the London Borough of Merton and provides NHS dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. The practice has a large car park to accommodate patients who visit.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, a foundation dentist, a locum dentist, two trainee dental nurses and a receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, both trainee dental nurses and the receptionist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

8.00am to 5.00pm Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday

8.00 to 12.00pm Friday and Saturday

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation. Improvements were required with regards to the storing of this information.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements. Improvements were required with regards to the storing of this information.
  • The provider had ineffective systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

28 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five people who used the service and three members of staff. People told us "it's an excellent service and I would be lost without them" and "my son was scared but they made him really comfortable. They are polite and friendly."

People told us, 'the dentist is very respectful and polite' and "they explained very kindly." All the people we spoke with felt they had enough information about their treatment choices and it was given in a way they could understand. We found evidence of this in patient notes.

People we spoke with said, 'I'm surprised they remember so much about me each time' and 'it's good quality treatment.' We found that dentists checked people's medical history, assessed risks and needs and provided treatment in line with treatment plans.

People told us they felt safe at the practice and we found that policies, procedures and staff training were in place around safeguarding people from abuse.

We found that appropriate infection control guidance had been followed. The premises were clean and people told us they were satisfied with the standards of hygiene.

People told us they felt staff were appropriately skilled and experienced. We saw evidence that the necessary checks had been done on staff.

Records of people's treatment and other records such as audits and meeting minutes were accurate and up to date.