During our inspection we set out to answer five questions: Is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led?Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection, speaking with people who used the service, the staff supporting them, and from looking at records.
For further evidence supporting our summary please read the full report.
Is the service safe?
We saw that people that used the service were treated with respect and in a dignified way by staff. We saw that safeguarding procedures were in place and staff understood their responsibilities in safeguarding the people that they cared for.
The service was clean, hygienic and safe from hazards, providing safe access to all areas of the home.
We looked at staff training arrangements that were in place and saw that the staff were provided with appropriate training to ensure safe and appropriate care was provided for the people that used the service.
We saw that systems were in place to record, report and monitor incidents and complaints. There were policies and procedures in relation to the Mental Capacity Act (2005) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. This ensured that people were protected from the risk of unlawful restraint.
Is the service effective?
People`s health needs were assessed with them, and included their relatives as part of the process. Arrangements were in place for people to be supported by other health care professionals, and people`s opinions and views were sought as part of the review process.
Is the service caring?
We saw that people were supported by kind and caring staff who spoke to them in a polite and respectful manner. People told us that the "Staff are very good; there is always somebody to help". Another said "There is no better than this, I can`t fault any of them". Another said "It`s marvellous, the staff are friendly, they are very good".
Staff were able to tell us about the people they supported. They knew people`s individual histories and support needs without having to refer to the care records. Staff were seen to take the time and listen to what people said, and they encouraged people to be independent by encouraging them to take part in activities such as going for walks in the garden.
People`s preferences, interests and diverse needs had been acknowledged and recorded in people`s care records. There was care support provided to meet those needs and interests. Family links were maintained and family and friends encouraged to visit.
Is the service responsive?
We saw that people were involved in a variety of activities. We saw people reading in the garden, and going for walks in the garden. We saw that people were involved in choosing their meals and how they spent their day. We noted that the home responded to the majority of people in the home who had expressed a view to not have residents meetings. Instead people wanted to express their views individually, which was respected by the home.
Is the service well led?
The manager had a good understanding of the needs of the people that used the service, as well as managing the requirements of the home. Staff told us that they were clear about their roles and responsibilities, and that they had a good understanding of the values of the home and the organisation that they worked for. Care records were updated regularly to monitor the service that people received. This helped to ensure that people received a good quality service at all times.
You can see our judgement on the front of this report.