• Dentist
  • Dentist

Church Street Dental Practice

52 Church Street, Orrell, Wigan, Greater Manchester, WN5 8TQ (01695) 625565

Provided and run by:
Mr. Mehboob Ahmed Butt

All Inspections

26 May 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 26 May 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by second CQC inspector.

We told the NHS England area team and Healthwatch that we were inspecting the practice. They did not provide any information of concern.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Church Street Dental Practice is in Wigan and provides NHS and private treatment to patients of all ages.

There is level access to the downstairs surgeries for people who use wheelchairs and pushchairs. On street parking is available near the practice.

The dental team includes six dentists, one of whom is a foundation dentist; six dental nurses who also cover reception, three of whom are trainees; one dental hygienist therapist and a practice manager. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection we collected 44 CQC comment cards filled in by patients. This information gave us a positive view of the practice.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist and received written information from an associate dentist and the foundation dentist. We also spoke with four dental nurses. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday 9:00am - 1:00pm and 2:00pm - 5:30pm

Tuesday 9:00am - 1:00pm and 2:00pm - 7:30pm

Wednesday 9:00am - 1:00pm and 2:00pm - 5:30pm

Thursday 9:00am - 1:00pm and 2:00pm - 5:30pm

Friday 9:00am - 1:00pm and 2:00pm - 5:00pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Minor adjustments were needed to the equipment for medical emergencies.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • The practice engaged with local and national oral health improvement schemes.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership. Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the practice’s arrangements for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and through the Central Alerting System (CAS), as well as from other relevant bodies such as, Public Health England (PHE).
  • Review availability of equipment to manage medical emergencies giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK), and the General Dental Council (GDC) standards for the dental team.
  • Review the practice’s infection control procedures and protocols giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Department of Health - Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices and The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.
  • Review the current legionella risk assessment and implement the required actions including the monitoring and recording of water temperatures, giving due regard to the guidelines issued by the Department of Health - Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices and The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.

22 March 2012

During a routine inspection

Patients we spoke with were very happy with the treatment they had received. Patients told us the dentist had only had the practice for two years and in that time they had seen improvements and would recommend the practice. Patients told us the staff were always very helpful. Patients knew about the complaints system and said they had never had any concerns or issues about the treatment received. They told us if they had an emergency they could telephone the practice and arrangements were made to see them as soon as possible. They said the surgery was always clean.

Patients told us they were given medical questionnaires to complete and that their medical history was always checked prior to receiving any treatment. They told us their treatment options were always discussed and that they were given a written copy of their treatment plan along with an estimate of any cost involved.