• Dentist
  • Dentist

B74 Dental Practice

184a Chester Road, Streetly, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, B74 3NA (0121) 353 7410

Provided and run by:
Mr David Jarrett

All Inspections

28 June 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of B74 Dental Practice on 28 June 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who had access to a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of B74 Dental Practice on 8 June 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well led care and was in breach of regulation 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 UK. We undertook a focussed follow up inspection of B74 Dental Practice on 5 October 2021 and found that some improvements had been made but the provider was not providing well led care and was in breach of regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for B74 dental practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan (requirement notice only). We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the area where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 5 October 2021.

Background

B74 Dental Practice is in Streetly, Sutton Coldfield and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available at the front of the practice.

The dental team includes one dentist (the provider), one dental nurse and a receptionist. The practice has one treatment room.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist (the provider). We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Tuesday & Friday from 9am to 1pm and 2pm to 5.30pm

Wednesday & Saturday – by appointment only

The practice is closed on all other days.

5 October 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection of B74 Dental Practice on 5 October 2021. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of B74 Dental Practice on 8 June 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well led care and was in breach of regulation 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for B74 Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan (requirement notice only). We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 8 June 2021.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made insufficient improvements to put right the shortfalls and had not responded to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 8 June 2021.

Background

B74 Dental is in Streetly, Sutton Coldfield and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available at the front of the practice.

The dental team includes one dentist (the provider) and one dental nurse who also works on reception. The practice has one treatment room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist (the provider). We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday - closed

Tuesday 9am – 1pm, 2pm – 5.30pm

Wednesday – by appointment

Thursday - closed

Friday 9am – 1pm, 2pm – 5.30pm

Saturday – by appointment

Sunday - closed

Our key findings were:

  • Staff had completed training, to an appropriate level, in the safeguarding of vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had sufficient amounts of in date medical oxygen, adrenaline and other equipment to respond to a medical emergency.
  • Sepsis oversight and management was established.
  • The provider had effective oversight and was aware of the current guidance with regards to prescribing medicines
  • Further action was required to ensure that appropriate information was recorded on dispensing labels.
  • A stock control system had been introduced for medicines held on the premises.
  • Improvements were required to the system for recording, investigating and reviewing incidents or significant events.
  • Systems for checking medical emergency equipment did not ensure that these were checked at the required frequency.
  • Staff had completed training in the management of medical emergencies.
  • The provider had effective oversight ensuring all clinical waste was removed safely.
  • Evidence was not available to demonstrate that the provider had taken action to implement all recommendations in the practice's Legionella risk assessment.
  • Infection prevention and control audits were not undertaken at regular intervals.
  • The provider had actioned the majority of recommendations from the previous fire risk assessment. One issue remained outstanding.
  • A five-year fixed wiring test was carried out in June 2021.
  • A centrally monitored system had been implemented to ensure patient referrals to other dental or health care professionals were received in a timely manner and not lost.
  • A system had been implemented for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports.
  • There was a sharps risk assessment but this did not include details of all sharp objects in use at the practice.
  • Further action should be taken to develop a system for the on-going assessment, supervision and appraisal of staff.
  • Policies and procedures had been reviewed on an annual basis or as needed if updates were required.
  • Action has been taken to ensure the clinician takes into account guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice when completing dental care records and guidance on the Safe use of X-ray Equipment or HP-CRCE-010. the reason for taking X-rays, a report on the findings and the quality of the image is being recorded in the patients’ dental care records or elsewhere in compliance with Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017.
  • Some further improvements are required to the practice's policies and procedures for obtaining patient consent to care and treatment to ensure they are in compliance with legislation, take into account relevant guidance, and staff follow them.
  • Audits had been scheduled for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice, but these had not yet been completed.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulation the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice's protocols for medicines management and ensure all medicines are stored and dispensed of safely and securely.

  • Implement an effective system for recording, investigating and reviewing incidents or significant events with a view to preventing further occurrences and ensuring that improvements are made as a result.

  • Improve and develop the practice's policies and procedures for obtaining patient consent to care and treatment to ensure they are in compliance with legislation, take into account relevant guidance, and staff follow them.

  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.

8 June 2021

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced focussed inspection on 8 June 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always asked the following questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

B74 Dental is in Streetly, Sutton Coldfield and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available at the front of the practice.

The dental team includes one dentist (the provider) and one dental nurse who also works on reception. The practice has one treatment room.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, the practice was closed, the practice owner was present during the inspection and we spoke with the dental nurse over the telephone. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday - closed

Tuesday 9am – 1pm, 2pm – 5.30pm

Wednesday – by appointment

Thursday - closed

Friday 9am – 1pm, 2pm – 5.30pm

Saturday – by appointment

Sunday - closed

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures, but some improvements were required; issues identified on the day of inspection were addressed immediately.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies but had not completed any update training during the Covid 19 pandemic. Not all appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available, missing items were ordered immediately.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children. The dental nurse required training to the appropriate level.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • Staff took care to protect patient’s privacy and personal information.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider had an efficient complaint system in place.
  • Some information governance arrangements were in place although improvements were required.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

Full details of the regulations the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure the clinicians take into account guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice when completing dental care records and guidance on the Safe use of X-ray Equipment or HP-CRCE-010. Clinicians should record in the patients’ dental care records or elsewhere the reason for taking X-rays, a report on the findings and the quality of the image in compliance with Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017.

  • Improve and develop the practice's policies and procedures for obtaining patient consent to care and treatment to ensure they are in compliance with legislation, take into account relevant guidance, and staff follow them.

  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.

4 June 2013

During a routine inspection

We arranged this visit to B74 Dental Surgery in advance. This helped to ensure that time was made available for us to speak with staff. During the inspection we spoke with the provider (who was also the dentist at the practice) a dental nurse, the receptionist and observed two consultations.

On the day of our visit we spoke with three people who used the service. After our visit we telephoned and spoke with five people registered at B74 Dental Surgery to ask them about their experiences of the service. The people we spoke with were complimentary about the service they had received. Their comments included, "I feel very comfortable with him (the dentist)" and "Always good treatment". People told us they were given the information they needed to be able to make an informed decision about their treatment. People told us that the practice was clean and tidy and we found that the provider had effective infection control procedures in place. This meant the risk of infection for people using the service was minimised.

The dental nurse and dentist had attended a range of training so that they had up to date knowledge and skills to treat people that attended the practice safely. There were systems in place that ensured people using the service were asked their views about the service. We saw examples of patient feedback which was positive.