• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Higher Lane Dental Practice

43 Higher Lane, Lymm, Cheshire, WA13 0BA (01925) 752209

Provided and run by:
Ms. Jane Butterworth

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

15 December 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 15 December 2015 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Higher Lane Dental Practice is located close to the centre of Lymm in a converted residential property and comprises two treatment rooms, waiting room, reception, and storage and staff rooms on the ground floor. There is one low step leading into the practice. Parking is available at the practice.

The practice provides general dental treatment and more complex treatment, including orthodontic treatment, implants and facial aesthetics, to private patients. The practice is open Monday 9am-5pm, (alternate weeks 8.30am-5pm), Tuesday and Friday 8.30am-6pm, Wednesday 9am-6pm, Thursday 9am-5pm, and alternate Saturdays 9.30am-2.30pm.

The practice is staffed by a practice manager, one dentist, a dental therapist/hygienist, a senior dental nurse, two dental nurses, and a trainee dental nurse.

Dr Jane Butterworth is the registered provider. A registered provider is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered providers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

Forty-nine people provided feedback about the service. All patients commented positively about the care and treatment they received from the practice. Patients commented that the staff were caring, helpful and respectful. Staff listened to, and took account of their individual needs. Patients reported no difficulty in arranging an appointment and treatment was carried out promptly in a safe and hygienic environment.

Our key findings were:

  • Appropriate equipment was available for staff to undertake their duties, and equipment was well maintained.
  • The practice recorded and analysed incidents and complaints, and cascaded learning to staff. Information was not available about the next steps if a complainant was not satisfied with the response from the practice.
  • The practice confirmed that staff had received safeguarding training and knew the processes to follow to raise concerns.
  • Staff had been trained to deal with medical emergencies, and emergency medicines and equipment were available, however the practice did not have an automated external defibrillator. This equipment was obtained after the inspection.
  • There were systems in place to reduce and minimise the risks and spread of infection but no evidence was seen of infection control training for staff. Evidence of this was provided after the inspection.
  • Patients’ care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with evidence based guidelines and current practice and legislation.
  • Patients received clear explanations about their proposed treatment, costs, benefits and risks and were involved in making decisions about treatment.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and confidentiality was maintained.
  • The appointment system met the needs of patients and waiting times were kept to a minimum.
  • The practice had a clear leadership structure, and staff felt involved and worked as a team.
  • The practice sought feedback from staff and patients about the services they provided.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Establish whether the practice is in compliance with its legal obligations under the Ionising Radiation Regulations (IRR) 1999.
  • Review the practice’s complaints procedure and provide information in relation to escalating complaints.
  • Review the implementation of the practice's recruitment policy and procedures to ensure they are operated effectively.

12 November 2012

During a routine inspection

During this review we visited Higher Lane Dental Practice and spoke with four patients.

Patients spoken with told us that they were very happy with the standard of treatment and care provided. Patients reported that all of the dental team were caring, professional and helpful.

Patients also told us they were given detailed information about their treatment options and costs and confirmed they understood what to expect before consenting to treatment. Comments received included: 'My treatment options have been discussed with me in detail. Everything from initial oral hygiene, treatment options and prognosis was discussed' and 'Before I came to see Jane [Registered Provider / Dentist] I was a very anxious patient. I have grown in confidence since coming here.'

One patient reported that she had been registered at the practice for approximately fifteen years. The patient reported that 'In my opinion the standard of dentistry here is excellent. I would recommend Jane (Registered Provider / Dentist) to my friends and family. Her attention to detail and commitment to patient care is outstanding.'

Patients spoken with reported that they had no complaints or concerns about the service and systems were in place to safeguard the welfare of people using the service.