Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Sheppey Healthy Living Centre on 20 June 2017. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report from the 20 June 2017 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Sheppey Healthy Living Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 16 November 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 20 June 2017. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.
Overall the practice is now rated as good.
Our key findings were as follows:
- There was a system for receiving and acting on safety alerts. The practice learned from patient and medicine safety alerts.
- There were systems to monitor patients on high risk medicines.
- The repeat prescribing policy had been updated. Patients who did not collect their prescriptions were contacted and the clinician was informed.
- The process to record significant events had been updated and provided an audit trail of actions taken and outcomes of investigations.
- The process to record complaints had been strengthened to include verbal complaints. Lessons were learned from individual concerns and complaints and also from the analysis of trends.
- The practice had identified 38 patients as carers (1.4% of the practice list). Written information was available to direct carers to the various avenues of support available to them.
- The practice had reviewed the needs of patients to ensure services were accessible. As a result of this review the practice was planning to provide a patient leaflet in Polish.
- A hearing loop was available at the practice.
- The practice had a process to assess whether a home visit was clinically necessary; and the urgency of the need for medical attention. In cases where the urgency of need was so great that it would be inappropriate for the patient to wait for a GP home visit, alternative emergency care arrangements were made. Clinical and non-clinical staff were aware of their responsibilities when managing requests for home visits.
- The practice had a policy for patients who did not attend appointments. Patients were sent a reminder 48 and 24 hours prior to their appointment. Patients who failed to attend appointments were contacted and the practice kept a record of why patients did not attend. This information was used for learning to improve accessibility.
- The practice had a patient participation group which had two members. The practice made efforts to attract additional patients to the forum. To increase opportunities to collect patient feedback and communicate with patients the practice had set up a virtual patient group which had 61 members.
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice