The Care Quality Commission
  • Dentist
  • Dentist

Dr Pauline Gail Carmichael

7 Longsight Road, Holcombe Brook, Bury, Lancashire, BL0 9SL (01204) 886408

Provided and run by:
Dr. Pauline Gail Carmichael

All Inspections

5 December 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 5 December 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Dr Pauline Gail Carmichael and Associates is in Bury and provides private treatment to adults and children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and pushchairs to the rear of the premises. Car parking spaces, including for patients with disabled badges, are available opposite the practice in a small shopping precinct.

The dental team includes three dentists, five dental nurses who also cover reception, a dental hygienist and a practice manager. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection we collected 56 CQC comment cards filled in by patients. This information gave us a positive view of the practice.

During the inspection we spoke with two dentists, two dental nurses, the dental hygienist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday,Tuesday and Thursday 9am to 5.30pm.

Wednesday 9am to 8pm,

Friday 9am to 3pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership. Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the practice’s arrangements for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and through the Central Alerting System (CAS), as well as from other relevant bodies such as, Public Health England (PHE).
  • Review staff awareness of Gillick competency and ensure all staff are aware of their responsibilities.
  • Review the availability of an interpreter service for patients who do not speak English as their first language.
  • Review the practice’s protocols for domiciliary visits taking into account the 2009 guidelines published by British Society for Disability and Oral Health in the document “Guidelines for the Delivery of a Domiciliary Oral Healthcare Service”.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

We did not speak with any people who use the service as part of the review. We looked at evidence submitted by the provider which showed that the provider had taken actions and the appropriate guidance relating to infection control had been followed.

11 June 2013

During a routine inspection

During the visit, we spoke with two people who use the service. They told us the dentist clearly explained the treatments offered and they were asked for consent verbally prior to receiving any treatment.

The people we spoke with told us they were very happy with the services provided. They told us they never had any problems getting an appointment and usually got an appointment at their preferred time. One person told us they needed emergency treatment and were seen the same day.

The people we spoke with told us they did not have any concerns about the cleanliness of the premises or the dental equipment and instruments. They told us the dental staff were very helpful and friendly. They also told us that they had no concerns about the service they received and would speak to the staff if they had any concerns or complaints.