• Dentist
  • Dentist

Lee On Solent Hampshire Also known as Innovate Dental Studio

152 High Street, Lee On The Solent, Hampshire, PO13 9DD (023) 9255 4485

Provided and run by:
Dr Andrew Smales

All Inspections

28 March 2018

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out a focused inspection of Lee on Solent known locally as Innovate Dental Studio on 28 March 2018.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We carried out the inspection to follow up concerns we originally identified during a comprehensive inspection at this practice on 29 November 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

At a comprehensive inspection we always ask the following five questions to get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment:

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it effective?
  • Is it caring?
  • Is it responsive to people’s needs?
  • Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions is not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the area where improvement was required.

At the previous comprehensive inspection we found the registered provider was providing safe, effective, caring and responsive care in accordance with relevant regulations. We judged the practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Lee on Solent known locally as Innovate Dental Studio on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements to put right the shortfalls and deal with the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 29 November 2017.

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

29 November 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 29 November 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We told the NHS England area team that we were inspecting the practice. They provided information which we took into account.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Lee on Solent Hampshire known locally as Innovate Dental Studio is in Lee on the Solent and provides private treatment to patients of all age and NHS treatment to children.

There is level access for people who use wheelchairs and pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including for patients with disabled badges, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes one dentist, one dental nurse, one dental nurse/practice manager, one dental hygienist, one dental hygienist therapist, one receptionist and one cleaner. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection we collected 10 CQC comment cards filled in by patients and spoke with five other patients. This information gave us a positive view of the practice.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist, one dental nurse, one dental nurse/practice manager and one receptionist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 9am to 3pm and Saturday 9am to 1pm on selected dates.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which did not reflect published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had some systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice did not have effective leadership. Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.

The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the security of prescription pads in the practice and ensure there are systems in place to track and monitor their use.
  • Review the practice's protocols for monitoring and recording the fridge temperature to ensure that medicines and dental care products are being stored in line with the manufacturer’s guidance.
  • Review availability of equipment such as an Automated External Defibrillator (AED) to manage medical emergencies taking into account guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK), and the General Dental Council (GDC) standards for the dental team. The provider must ensure a risk assessment is undertaken if a decision is made to not have an AED on-site.
  • Review stocks of medicines and equipment and the system for identifying, disposing and replenishing of out-of-date stock.
  • Review the practice's protocols for completion of dental care records taking into account guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice regarding clinical examinations and record keeping.
  • Review the current staffing arrangements to ensure all dental care professionals are adequately supported by a trained member of the dental team when treating patients in a dental setting taking into account the guidance issued by the General Dental Council.

7 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke to three people who used the service and all of the people we spoke with were satisfied with the service they received.

We saw that leaflets were available for people in the reception and waiting area. These provided information about the type of services on offer including the costs of treatment, the different types of treatments and opening times. There was also information about the staff who worked at the service. We saw that the waiting area was comfortable and people were able to relax before and after treatment.

People told us that they were able to make informed decisions. They said they had enough information to make a decision about their treatment options.

We were told that the dentist fully explained the options about any treatment they were being offered. People said they were able to ask any questions and that staff explained things to them clearly.