Updated 18 May 2019
The inspection:
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
This inspection was completed by an inspector and an expert by experience. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type:
The service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. It provides a service to older adults. Not everyone using Home Instead Senior Care, Greenwich & Bexley receives a regulated activity. CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also take into account any wider social care provided.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection:
The Inspection site visit activity started on 8 March 2019. We visited the office location on 8 and 15 March 2019 to see the manager and office staff; and to review care records and policies and procedures.
What we did:
Before the inspection, we reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. This included details about incidents the provider must notify us about, such as abuse and accident and incidents. We sought feedback from the local authorities who commission services from the provider and professionals who work with the service. The provider completed a provider information return. This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We used all this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection, we spoke with three people that used the service and 12 relatives to ask their views about the service. We spoke with four members of staff including the registered manager, the nominated individual and a company director. We also spoke to two healthcare professionals.
We reviewed a range of records. This included five people’s care plans, risk assessments and medicine records. We looked at five staff files in relation to recruitment, training and supervision. We also looked at records relating to the management of the service and a variety of policies and procedures developed and implemented by the provider.