We carried out a review of the data available to us about Stoke-on-Trent City Council on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Stoke-on-Trent City Council, you can give feedback on this service.
Not everyone using the service receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also take into account any wider social care provided. There were 61 people receiving personal care at the time of this inspection.
This inspection site visit took place on 29 June 2018. Telephone calls to people, relatives and staff took place on 28, 29 June and 5 July 2018. This was the first ratings inspection for the service.
There were two registered managers in post at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People were safeguarded from abuse. People had plans in place which supported them to reduce the risks to their safety.
There were enough staff employed to provide consistent care to people. People received support from staff to administer their medicines safely. People were protected from the risk of infection. The registered managers had systems in place to learn when things went wrong.
People’s needs were assessed; and care plans were in place to guide staff. Staff received the training and support they needed to deliver effective care. People were supported to eat and drink enough and their choice was promoted.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff were aware of how to support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service were supportive of this practice. People were supported to access health professionals when required.
People were supported by caring staff that protected their privacy and dignity. People had support to make decisions and choices about their care and maximise their independence.
People’s preferences were understood by staff and recorded in their care plans. Care plans were developed alongside people and regularly reviewed to ensure they were accurate. People understood how to make a complaint and felt their concerns would be addressed.
People, relatives and staff were aware of the values and vision of the service and staff were passionate about promoting people’s independence.
Staff felt supported and listened to by management. The service had systems in place to gather feedback and continuously improve.
There were systems in place and operated effectively to monitor and improve the quality and safety of services provided.
The service worked well in partnership with other agencies and their achievements had been recognised by winning an award.