This announced inspection was carried out on 6 September 2016. St Alex Support Limited is registered to provide personal care and support for people in their own homes. At the time of our inspection 20 people received care and support from this service across six supported living schemes that were managed by St Alex Support Limited. The majority of people living at the services had mental health needs, with each scheme offering a service to men or women. This was the first inspection since the service was registered by the new provider in November 2015.
St Alex Support Limited had a registered manager at the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People told us they felt safe at the schemes and that staff were caring and capable of doing their job well.
Staff understood how to recognise and protect people from abuse. They received ongoing training around how to keep people safe. Safeguarding concerns had been dealt with appropriately. Staff were not allowed to start work until references had been received and checks had been made to make sure they were suitable to work with the people that used the service.
People told us that they felt confident that staff had the knowledge and skills to provide the right care and support. We found that staff had regular refresher training in the key areas including medicines administration and health and safety, to enable them to deliver safe and effective care. Supervision took place on a regular basis.
Health and social care professionals told us that the staff were responsive if people became unwell, and we could see from records that that staff supported people to access healthcare professionals when needed. People were supported to take their medicines safely when they needed it.
Care plans and risk assessments were in place. We identified two risk assessments which did not contain the most up to date information and guidance for staff on specific risks. We have made a recommendation in relation to quality audits to minimise risk assessments containing out of date information.
People told us they had choice over the support they received and nothing was done without their consent. We saw all documents were signed by people using the service. This showed they were involved in their care and support planning.
The majority of the schemes we found were in good decorative order, but two services were not maintained to a good standard of cleanliness. Following the inspection these services have been deep cleaned. We found some minor repairs were outstanding across the schemes.
Medicines were administered safely but the temperature for storage was not routinely recorded. This was of concern as the efficacy for some medicines is reduced if stored incorrectly.
We checked how complaints and accidents were recorded and managed. Both were dealt with safely and effectively and we could see areas in which corrective action had taken place as a result.
The staff spoke well of working for the organisation and there was a culture of openness. The registered manager was embedding systems in the new organisation to ensure the service was of a good standard.
There was one breach in relation to medicines management and we have made recommendations in relation to quality audits, fire safety and collation of local community information at the schemes.
You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.