Peter Kertesz Dental Surgery

We carried out this announced comprehensive inspection on 23 August 2023. under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations.

The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental advisor.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following 5 questions:

• Is it safe?
• Is it effective?
• Is it caring?
• Is it responsive to people’s needs?
• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

• The dental clinic appeared clean and well-maintained.
• The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
• Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
• Safeguarding processes were in place and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
• The practice had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
• Clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
• Patients were treated with dignity and respect. Staff took care to protect patients’ privacy and personal information.
• Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
• The appointment system worked efficiently to respond to patients’ needs.
• The frequency of appointments was agreed between the dentist and the patient, giving due regard to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
• There was effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
• Staff felt involved, supported, and worked as a team.
• Staff and patients were asked for feedback about the services provided.
• Complaints were dealt with positively and efficiently.
• The practice had information governance arrangements.
• The practice had systems to manage risks for patients, staff, equipment, and the premises. Improvements were required in regards to risks associated with using some products.
• Improvements were required in regards to the frequency of radiographic audits.

Background

Peter Kertesz is in Mayfair in the London borough of Westminster and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

The practice is located on the first floor of the building and there are steps to access it. There is a chair lift for those able to use it. Those who cannot use the chair lift are directed to other local dental providers. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes the principal dentist, a dental nurse, a dental hygienist and a receptionist. The practice has 2 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the whole team. We looked at practice policies, procedures, and other records to assess how the service is managed.

The practice is open: 9am to 5pm Monday to Thursday.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

• Improve the practice's processes for the control of substances hazardous to health identified by the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, to ensure risk assessments are undertaken for all items.
• Take action to ensure audits of radiography are undertaken at regular intervals to improve the quality of the service.