26 May 2021
During an inspection looking at part of the service
Previous overall rating, 15 May 2019: Good.
Previous rating for the key question Safe: Requires Improvement.
This service is again rated as Good overall.
The key questions are rated as: -
Are services safe? – Good
The ratings carried forward from our previous inspection are: -
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? – Good
Are services well-led? – Good
We previously carried out a comprehensive inspection of Samedaydoctor London City Clinic on 15 May 2019, under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. The inspection was conducted to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008. We rated the service Good overall and in respect of the key questions Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. We rated the service as Requires Improvement in relation to the key question Safe. There were procedures in place for monitoring and managing risks. However: -
- There was a lack of a systemic approach for ensuring patient safety alerts had been actioned.
- The provider could not demonstrate care was provided in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm. For example: the adult and children safeguarding policies needed to be updated to reflect some of the new categories of abuse, the provider needed to evidence that staff had a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check at an appropriate level to their role, and Patient Group Directions (PGDs) needed to be current and up to date.
- There were clear responsibilities, roles and systems for accountability to support good governance and management, but some of the arrangements, such as consultation reviews, were on an informal basis, so it was difficult for the provider to evidence any action taken or feedback given.
We served requirement notices in relation to Regulations 17 and 19 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 and made some recommendations for improvement. The provider had produced a plan of actions to address these.
We carried out this focussed inspection to review the action taken by the service provider to meet the requirements of the regulations and to re-assess the rating for the key question Safe. We found the provider had taken appropriate action to address the issues noted at our inspection in May 2019 and have revised the rating for the key question Safe to Good.
The provider offers a range of private GP services, including face to face, video and telephone consultations, email exchange consultations, and testing. It offers referrals for x-rays and scans and to specialists for secondary care. It also provides services relating to sexual health and vaccinations, including provision of childhood immunisations.
The clinical lead for the service is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’ with legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.
Our key findings were:
- The provider had introduced an effective procedure for monitoring and actioning patient safety alerts.
- Safeguarding policies had been revised. Evidence of appropriate DBS checks was maintained, and suitable risk assessments carried out.
- Patient Group Directions (PGDs) relating to administering vaccines and medications were no longer used in the service. Where appropriate, Patient Specific Directions (PSDs) were used in accordance with relevant guidance.
- There was an effective system for conducting consultation and notes reviews and for feedback from the review to be given to members of the clinical team.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care