Everycare Wirral

Updated 9 May 2018

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection checked whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 16 and 23 February 2018, the first day of the inspection was unannounced.

Inspection site visit activity started on 16 February 2018 and ended on 23 February 2018. It included visiting the office, speaking with staff and visiting people who used the service in their homes. We visited the office location on both the 16 and 23 February 2018 to see the registered manager and office staff; to speak with care staff and to review care records and policies and procedures. We also visited three people who used the service on the 23 February 2018.

The inspection was completed by an adult social care inspector. Prior to the inspection we looked at the information we held about the service, such as notifications about events that the service is required to send to the Care Quality Commission. Before the inspection, we asked the registered provider to complete a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We used all of this information to plan how the inspection should be conducted.

During the inspection we spoke with three people who used the service and five relatives of people who use the service. We spoke with the nominated individual the company who was also the nominated individual; the nominated individual is the person who is nominated for supervising the management of the regulated activity. We also spoke with the registered manager, two supervisors and six care staff. We looked at the care records for five people and the files for five members of staff.

Updated 9 May 2018

This inspection of Everycare Wirral took place on 16 and 23 February 2018, the first day of the inspection was unannounced. This is the first inspection of this location.

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to older adults living in their own homes in the community.. Not everyone using Everycare Wirral receives the regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; which is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection Everycare Wirral was providing personal care for 31 people.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People’s family members told us that the service was safe and reliable. One person’s relative told us that the reliability of the service together with the relationships built up with care staff made them, “feel safe in their hands.” Another person’s relative told us, “Everything is always fine, there are no problems, I trust the carers. They make us feel comfortable in our home.”

There was a system in place to make sure that people received the visits they needed. People told us that carers were very rarely late and if they were they made a phone call. If needed emergency cover was available from the senior member of staff who was on-call. Staff logged in and out of visits and these logs were recorded. We looked at one staff members’ schedule and saw that the correct time was allocated to each call including travel time to ensure people’s needs were safely met in a timely manner.

The registered manager told us and people confirmed that the service aims to have the same staff visit people, so staff knew people’s needs and have an opportunity to build up a relationship with them. People told us that new staff are always introduced to them before they start.

New staff members spent a period shadowing the work of an experienced staff member; this was often for a couple of days. Staff told us that they found this shadow period helpful for them to learn of people’s preferences, pick up important details and get to know people. One staff member told us, “When I went out by myself I felt confident.”

The quality of support provided to people was monitored by unannounced spot checks completed by the registered manager and feedback being sought from people both informally and by a feedback questionnaire. People’s medication administration records and records of the care provided were checked by the registered manager.

The service had recruitment procedures in place to help ensure that new staff were suitable to work with vulnerable adults. However on occasions this process had not been followed robustly. Also staff knowledge of safeguarding procedures and the safeguarding policy of the service needed improving.

People’s care files contained important information to help keep people safe and also their likes, dislikes and preferences. We saw appropriate risk assessments had been completed and contained guidance for staff on how to reduce risks to people. We also saw that people’s consent to their care was sought in line with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. People were treated with respect and their confidential personal data was protected.

If appropriate people were supported with their health needs and appropriate information was contained within people’s care files.

People and their relatives told us that they had confidence in the skills and abilities of the care staff who visited their homes. Staff told us that they were well supported in their roles. One staff member told us, “It’s brilliant. I absolutely love this job”. Another staff member told us, “The job is great I love it. The company is very good and supportive.”

People and their families gave us examples of how they thought the service was very caring. One family member told us, “They have made a colossal difference, [name] would not be alive without them, she was going downhill before. But they are fantastic with her, absolutely fantastic, they are friendly, cheerful and nothing is too much trouble. My wife responds to them, they sing to her, they are cheerful and bring joy. She smiles when they come in, they sit with her and paint her nails and really look after her hair.”

Another person told us how they had been supported to make improvements in their life and with friendly encouragement had been regaining skills they had lost. They told us that they thought this was because of good support from care staff. They told us, “They [care staff] are not in and out, they take their time and help me to make improvements. I have really been helped to improve by the staff from Everycare.”

People cared for; their relatives and staff members were all praising of the leadership of the service. People knew and had confidence in the registered manager and nominated individual. Some people told us of examples when they had asked for help and had been really happy with the response. One family member finished by saying, “Care [sector] gets a bad reputation, but I am blown away by them.”

The nominated individual of the service and the registered manager were very involved in the day to day running of the service. The registered manager also ensured that audits took place to ensure the quality of the service being provided to people. This ensured that the registered manager had oversight of the service being provided to people.