We carried out a review of the data available to us about Home Instead Mid Cornwall on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Home Instead Mid Cornwall, you can give feedback on this service.
At the time of our inspection twenty people were receiving a personal care service. These services were funded either privately, through Cornwall Council or NHS funding.
There was a registered manager in post who was responsible for the day-to-day running of the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
We carried out this announced inspection on 16 October and 17 October 2017. This was the service’s first inspection since it was registered in March 2016.
People told us they were positive about the support they received from the service. They said the service was, “Doing an excellent job. I cannot say anything bad about them,” and “They are first class. Good as gold.”
People told us they felt safe. Staff had received training in how to recognise and report abuse. All were clear about how to report any concerns and were confident that any allegations made would be fully investigated to help ensure people were protected.
There were enough suitably qualified staff available to meet people’s needs. The service was flexible and responded to people’s changing needs. People told us they had a team of regular staff and their visits were at the agreed times. People told us they had never experienced a missed care visit.
People received care from staff who knew them well, and had the knowledge and skills to meet their needs. People and their relatives spoke very highly of staff and typical comments included; “Very nice. They are respectful and kind,” and “They have a laugh. It makes all the difference if you are unwell.”
Staff were knowledgeable about the people they cared for and knew how to recognise if people’s needs changed.
Staff were aware of people’s preferences and interests, as well as their health and support needs, which enabled them to provide a personalised service. Staff were kind and compassionate and treated people with dignity and respect.
The management had a clear understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and how to make sure people who did not have the mental capacity to make decisions
for themselves had their legal rights protected.
Staff told us there was good communication with the management of the service. Staff said management were, “Very supportive,” and “Very approachable.”
There were effective quality assurance systems in place. The service had an effective management team, and Care Quality Commission registration, and notification requirements had been complied with.