• Dentist
  • Dentist

Signature Smiles Dental Practice

3-4 Brook Buildings, Gobowen, Shropshire, SY11 3JP (01692) 662719

Provided and run by:
Mrs Diana Jaffri

All Inspections

27 February 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection of Signature Smiles Dental Practice on 27 February 2020. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Signature Smiles Dental Practice on 7 August 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well-led care and was in breach of regulations 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Signature Smiles Dental Practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 7 August 2019.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 7 August 2019.

Background

Signature Smiles Dental Practice is in Gobowen, Shropshire and provides NHS treatment for adults and children. The practice is one of two within Shropshire registered under the same provider.

There is ramped access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes six dentists, four dental nurses including three trainee dental nurses and a practice manager. The practice has three treatment rooms and centralised decontamination facilities.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist, an area manager and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday: from 8.30am to 5.30pm.

Our key findings were:

  • Emergency medicines and equipment were as described in the Resuscitation Council UK’s national guidance.
  • Infection prevention and control audits had been completed on a six-monthly basis in line with national guidance.
  • The infection control lead had completed additional training to support their role.
  • The practice had a system for receiving alerts from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and Central Alerting System.
  • The practice had a whistleblowing (speak up) policy and this was available to all staff.
  • The practice had a system for recording accidents and significant events. This was being reviewed and updated at the time of this inspection.
  • All staff had received a formal appraisal of their performance in the 12 months leading up to this inspection. Dentists had completed personal development plans in line with requirements from the General Dental Council.
  • Radiography audits had been completed for dentists in the 2 months leading up to this inspection.
  • Safeguarding protocols were in place to reduce risk and help keep patients safe.
  • Information held at the practice relating to the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health had been updated.
  • Staff files demonstrated all clinical staff had received inoculations to protect them from the Hepatitis B virus, and their level of immunity was recorded within their personnel file.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement an effective system for recording, investigating and reviewing incidents or significant events with a view to preventing further occurrences and ensuring that improvements are made as a result.

7 August 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this unannounced focused inspection on 7 August 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser and an inspection manager.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we asked the following two questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Signature Smiles is in Gobowen, Shropshire and provides NHS treatment to adults and children.

There is ramp access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking is not available on site, however there is a public car park across the road from the surgery. There are no dedicated parking spaces for blue badge holders.

The dental team includes 3 dentists, 4 trainee dental nurses and 1 receptionist. The practice has 3 treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with two dentists, three trainee dental nurses, one company director and the area manager. The registered manager was unavailable on the day of inspection. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice was open: Monday to Friday 8.30am to 5.30pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • We saw that staff treated patients with dignity and respect.
  • Staff worked well as a team.
  • The practice did not appear clean and well maintained throughout.
  • There were a lack of systems and processes to ensure staff had full awareness of their responsibilities in relation to the duty of candour which was not in compliance with The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.
  • The provider did not have adequate systems in place to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • Governance arrangements required significant review and strengthening.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements.

They should:

  • Review the availability of equipment in the practice to manage medical emergencies taking into account the guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the General Dental Council.
  • Review the security of NHS prescription pads in the practice and ensure there are systems in place to track and monitor their use.
  • Review the practice’s sharps procedures to ensure the practice is complying with the Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013
  • Review the practice’s recruitment policy and procedures to ensure accurate, complete and detailed records are maintained for all staff

8 March 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 8 March 2016 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Background

Signature Smiles Dental Practice Gobowen is part of a group of 14 dental practices and is a mixed dental practice providing mainly NHS and some private treatment for both adults and children. The practice is situated in a converted commercial property. The practice has two dental treatment rooms and a separate decontamination room for cleaning, sterilising and packing dental instruments. Dental care is provided on the ground floor with a reception and waiting area.

The practice is open between 8.30am and 5.30pm from Monday to Friday. The practice has two dentists who are supported by six dental nurses, two receptionists, a practice manager and two area managers.

One of the practice owners is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager is supported in their role by the other practice owner and an area manager.

Before the inspection we sent Care Quality Commission comment cards to the practice for patients to complete to tell us about their experience of the practice. We received feedback from nine patients and an additional four patients on the day of our visit. These provided a positive view of the services the practice provides. Patients commented on the high quality of care provided by the dentists, the friendly nature of all staff and the cleanliness of the practice.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice philosophy was to provide friendly patient centred care with an emphasis on the prevention of dental disease at all times.
  • Staff had been trained to handle emergencies, appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment was readily available in accordance with current guidelines.
  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • Infection control procedures were in place and the practice followed published guidance.
  • The practice had a safeguarding lead and processes in place for safeguarding adults and children living in vulnerable circumstances.
  • Staff reported incidents and kept records of these which the practice used for shared learning.
  • Dentists provided dental care in accordance with current professional and National Institute for Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines
  • The service was aware of the needs of the local population and took these into account in how the practice was run.
  • Patients could access treatment as well as urgent and emergency care when required.
  • Staff recruitment files contained essential information in relation to Regulation 18, Schedule 3 of Health & Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2015.
  • Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and were supported in their continued professional development by the practice manager.
  • Staff we spoke to felt supported by the practice owner and area manager and were committed to providing a quality service to their patients.
  • Information from nine completed Care Quality Commission (CQC) comment cards gave us a positive picture of a friendly and professional service.
  • The practice owner and area manager provided effective leadership for staff working at the practice
  • The practice reviewed and dealt with complaints according to their practice policy

26 November 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with talked highly of the dental practice. One person told us that their dentist was "Very professional" and commented on how friendly and flexible the practice was. They said, 'All the staff are brilliant'. Another person said, 'I am not so afraid to visit now'.

People confirmed that they had been involved in making decisions about their dental care and treatment options. They said they were given clear information about their treatment and the costs involved. There were arrangements in place to deal with emergency situations including training for all staff in medical emergencies and resuscitation.

People expressed satisfaction with the standard of cleanliness and hygiene. The practice had arrangements in place for the safe management of infection prevention. Staff had received training to reduce the risk of infection.

People told us the practice staff were welcoming and friendly. Dental nurses told us they were supported in their work. They said they were provided with opportunities to further develop their skills and knowledge in their work.

People had access to a complaints system. People we spoke with were aware of how to complain if they were unhappy with the service they had received. They told us they had no reason to complain with their service.