We carried out a review of the data available to us about KLM Home Cares on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about KLM Home Cares, you can give feedback on this service.
KLM Home Cares is registered as an individual so they are a sole trader who is self-employed. They are registered to provide personal care to people in their own home. Nine people were receiving personal care at the time of the inspection. The individual is the ‘registered person’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People we spoke with and their relatives said the service was safe. They were complimentary about the staff who cared for them and had no concerns. They had regular contact with the registered person who was described as ‘nice’ and ‘approachable’. People felt the service was person centred and were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Everyone told us they would recommend the service to others.
People’s care was assessed and planned, and preferences around care delivery were identified. When required people received appropriate support to make sure their nutritional and health needs were met. Risk assessments were completed around individual needs and the environment, although at times it was not clear that risk was being appropriately managed because the assessment was confusing. People said they received their medicines as prescribed but guidance around administering medicines was not always appropriate or consistently followed. We have made a recommendation about the management of some medicines.
Staff felt well supported and said they had received training to help them understand how to do their job well. Staff knowledge around safeguarding and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was limited; the registered person said they were going to make sure additional training was provided.
People received care from familiar and consistent care workers who arrived on time and stayed for the agreed length of time. Recruitment checks were carried out before staff started work although these were not always done thoroughly. We have made a recommendation about recruitment.
Everyone we spoke with told us the service was well led. We saw people were encouraged to share their views about the service. The registered person was knowledgeable about the service, its vision and values. They had systems in place for assessing the quality of the service although not all were formalised.