We carried out a review of the data available to us about NAS Community Services (East Anglia) on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about NAS Community Services (East Anglia), you can give feedback on this service.
At the time of this announced comprehensive inspection of 14 February 2018 there were seven people who used the service. The provider was given 48 hours’ notice because it is a small service and we wanted to be certain the registered manager and key staff would be available on the day of our inspection. We also wanted to give them sufficient time to seek agreements with people so that we could visit them in their homes to find out their experience of the service.
A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People and their relatives had developed good relationships with the support workers and the registered manager. People received care that was personalised and responsive to their needs. They were able to express their views and support workers listened to what they said and took action to ensure their decisions were acted on.
People’s care records were accurate and reflected the support provided. Support workers consistently protected people’s privacy and dignity.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and support workers supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Procedures and guidance in relation to the MCA were followed which included steps that the provider should take to comply with legal requirements.
Systems were in place to minimise the risks to people, including from abuse, mobility, nutrition and with accessing the community. Support workers understood their roles and responsibilities in keeping people safe.
Recruitment checks were carried out with sufficient numbers of support workers employed who had the knowledge and skills through regular supervision and training to meet people’s needs.
Where people required assistance with their medicines, safe systems were followed. Support workers were provided with training in infection control and food hygiene and understood their responsibilities relating to these areas. Systems were in place to reduce the risks of cross infection.
The service worked in partnership with other agencies. Where support workers had identified concerns in people’s wellbeing there were systems in place to contact health and social care professionals to make sure they received appropriate care and treatment. Where required, people were safely supported with their dietary needs.
There was a complaints procedure in place and people knew how to voice their concerns if they were unhappy with the care they received. People’s feedback was valued and acted on. The service had a quality assurance system and shortfalls were identified and addressed. As a result the quality of the service continued to progress.