• Dentist
  • Dentist

Shakespeare House Dental Practice

Shakespeare House, 147 Welholme Road, Grimsby, South Humberside, DN32 9LR (01472) 340908

Provided and run by:
Mr Ventseslav Todorov Yankov

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

8 October 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up desk-based review of Shakespeare House Dental Practice on 8 October 2020. This follow up was to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The review was led by a CQC inspector who had access to a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Shakespeare House Dental Practice on 11 November 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe and well led care and was in breach of regulations 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Shakespeare House Dental Practice on our website .

As part of this inspection we asked:

•Is it safe?

•Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Shakespeare House Dental Practice is in Grimsby and provides private treatment for adults and children.

There is a single step to enter the practice. A portable ramp is available to assist people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice on local roads.

The dental team includes the principal dentist, one dental nurse, one receptionist and the practice manager. The practice has two treatment rooms, with one in use.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

As part of the desk-based review, we reviewed the provider’s action plan and all written and photographic evidence submitted to us. The practice had identified where there was a shortfall and had actions in place to ensure the practice was providing safe and well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The practice is open: Monday 9am – 5.30pm, Tuesday 9am – 5pm, Wednesday 9am – 3pm and Friday 10am – 4pm.

Our key findings were :

  • Fire safety management systems were in line with current regulations.
  • Systems to ensure equipment held in the medical emergency kit reflected recommended guidance was effective.
  • Medicines were prescribed in line with relevant guidance.
  • The risk mitigation process to protect staff with a low response to the Hepatitis B vaccination was effective.
  • Safe sharps systems had been risk assessed and complied with current regulations.
  • A system was in place to confirm the practice’s response to patient safety alerts.
  • Audits were carried out in line with guidance.
  • All seating in the treatment room was wipeable and complied with relevant guidance.
  • Staff awareness of Gillick competency and associated staff responsibilities was reviewed and updated.

11 November 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 11 November 2019 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Shakespear House Dental Practice is in Grimsby and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is a single step to enter the practice. A portable ramp is available to assist people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice on local roads.

The dental team includes the principal dentist, one dental nurse, one receptionist and the practice manager. The practice has two treatment rooms, with one in use.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, we collected 42 CQC comment cards filled in by patients. All comments were positive about the service being provided.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, the dental nurse, the receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday 9am – 5.30pm, Tuesday 9am – 5pm, Wednesday 9am – 3pm and Friday 10am – 4pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Systems in place to manage the medical emergency kit were not effective.
  • The dispensing of medicines was not in line with guidance.
  • Improvements could be made to current systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • Improvements could be made to management and oversight of clinical governance.
  • Audit systems could be brought in line with guidance.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice’s infection control procedures and protocols taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance’: In particular: ensure the additional seating available in the treatment room is wipeable.
  • Improve and develop staff awareness of Gillick competency and ensure all staff are aware of their responsibilities in relation to this.