• Dentist
  • Dentist

Complete Dental

64 St Leonards Road, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 3BY (01753) 864484

Provided and run by:
Kingfisher Hill Limited

All Inspections

31/01/2018

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our announced comprehensive inspection of this practice on 14 September 2017 we found breaches of legal requirements of to the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in relation to:

  • Regulation 17 Good Governance
  • Regulation 19 Fit and Proper Persons employed

We undertook this focused inspection to check that the provider now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to these requirements. You can read the report from our previous comprehensive inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Complete Dental at www.cqc.org.uk.

Are services Well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Key findings

  • Overall, we found that effective action had been taken to address the shortfalls identified at our previous inspection and the provider was now compliant with the regulation.

14/09/2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 14 September 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Complete Dental is in Windsor and provides Private treatment to patients of all ages.

The practice is based on the first floor and as such cannot treat patients who find stairs a barrier. New patients are advised of this when they first contact the practice.

The dental team includes the two dentists, two dental nurses, one dental hygenist, a receptionist who is also the practice manager and a business manager.

The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection we collected 35 CQC comment cards filled in by patients and obtained the views of two other patients. This information gave us a completely positive view of the practice.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, a dental nurse and a receptionist who was also the practice manager.

The practice is open 8.30am to 5.30pm Monday to Wednesday, 8.30am to 7pm on Thursday, 8.30am to 3pm Friday and one Saturday a month.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • Generally the practice infection control procedures reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • Staff appraisals were not carried out.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Most clinical staff completed the continuous professional development required for their registration with the General Dental Council.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Risk assessments had not been carried out for needle stick injuries and protection from blood borne virus for those clinical staff without Hep B immunity.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • Staff training records were not collated to assess the status of individual staff competency.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • Staff recruitment procedures were not effective.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice had a procedure in place to deal with complaints.
  • Risk assessments had not been carried out for electrical and gas safety.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure procedures are established to assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of service users and others who may be at risk.
  • Ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisal necessary to enable them to carry out the duties.
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed, and ensure specified information is available regarding each person employed.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the current staffing arrangements to ensure all dental care professionals are adequately supported by a trained member of the dental team when treating patients in a dental setting taking into account the guidance issued by the General Dental Council.
  • Review the practice’s system for recording, investigating and reviewing incidents or significant events, with a view to preventing further occurrences and ensuring that improvements are made as a result.
  • Review its responsibilities to the needs of disabled people, including those with hearing difficulties and the requirements of the Equality Act 2010.
  • Review availability of an interpreter services for patients who do not speak English as a first language.
  • Review arrangements for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and through the Central Alerting System (CAS), as well as from other relevant bodies such as, Public Health England (PHE).
  • Review availability of equipment to manage medical emergencies taking into account guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK), and the General Dental Council (GDC) standards for the dental team.

12 December 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three patients who use the service. All were complimentary of the dental team and the service they provided. One patient told us, 'I think they are excellent, extremely competent and thorough. They cannot be faulted.'

Patients we spoke with told us staff explained all the procedures and treatments to them and respected their decisions about their treatment and care. They told us they were able to see their X-rays and were given print outs of their treatment plans. We looked at seven patient records. Records contained relevant information for assessments and treatment provided. Patients who use the service were asked for their views about their care and treatment.

We toured the practice and found it to be clean, hygienic and free of clutter. Dental instruments were decontaminated in line with the Department of Health standards. Adequate infection controls procedures were in place and routinely followed by staff.

Staff undertook appropriate training and were supported to deliver effective care and treatment safely. Staff told us they felt supported by management.

Patients we spoke with were happy with the care provided and had no complaints. The practice's complaints procedure was available in the reception area for patients to read.