Archived: Keymen Associates Ltd Also known as Mayday Homecare

There was a registered manager at the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who used the service felt safe with the people who supported them. Staff files showed the recruitment system was robust and people employed had been checked via the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) to ensure they were suitable to work with vulnerable people. Staff rotas showed there were enough staff to meet the needs of the people who currently used the service.

There was an electronic call monitoring service in place and an out of hours on call system which helped ensure visits were not missed. There were appropriate individual risk assessments within the care plans. There was a staff health and safety manual to ensure staff were aware of how to keep themselves and people who used the service as safe as possible.

The service had a relevant and up to date safeguarding policy and procedure and all staff had had training in safeguarding. The medicines systems were safe and staff had undertaken appropriate training in medicines administration.

Records showed a thorough induction programme for new staff. Further training was on-going and staff were required to complete regular refresher courses for mandatory subjects.

Care plans we reviewed included relevant information about people’s health and well-being. People’s nutritional and hydration needs were clearly documented, along with any allergies and special dietary needs.

The service was working within the legal requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

People who used the service told us the staff were kind and caring. Staff we spoke with were positive about their jobs.

We saw from care plans we looked at that independence was promoted and people told us their dignity and privacy were respected. There was a service user guide which included relevant information about the service.

Care files we looked at were person-centred and people’s choices for their care and support were respected.

Risk assessments and care plans were reviewed on a regular basis. Any changes were clearly documented within the care files. Activities, such as accompanying people who used the service to the shops, were facilitated by the service if possible.

Regular feedback was sought from people who used the service via telephone calls and quality assurance surveys. There was an up to date complaints policy and procedure and complaints were dealt with appropriately.

The registered manager was experienced and had been in post for some time. People who used the service told us they could contact the management team when they needed to and care staff felt well supported by management.

Regular staff supervisions and appraisals were carried out and there were staff meetings held on a regular basis. We saw records of regular observations of staff competence which were undertaken by the management.

There were a number of audits carried out on a regular basis. All were followed up with appropriate actions where required.