Updated 6 April 2019
The inspection:
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type:
Whincup Care Limited is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. Whincup Care Limited accommodates up to six people in one adapted building.
The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection:
The inspection was unannounced on 27 February 2019. We informed the registered manager we would return on 28 February 2019.
What we did:
• Our inspection was informed by evidence we already held about the service. We checked for feedback we received from members of the public, and local authorities. We checked records held by Companies House and the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).
• Due to technical problems, we did not ask the provider to complete a Provider Information Return. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements.
• We spoke with four people who use the service and three relatives. We observed staff interactions with people at lunch time and during other activities throughout the inspection visit. We spoke with the registered manager, four care workers, and the director of care. We spoke with one social worker, one commissioner, one district nurse and an external college leader. We received email feedback from the local authority safeguarding team.
• We reviewed parts of five people's care records including care plans, risk assessments and medicines administration records. We checked two staff members’ personnel files and other records about the management of the service. After our inspection, we asked the registered manager to send us further documents which we received promptly and reviewed as part of our inspection.