• Dentist
  • Dentist

Ewell Orthodontics

175 Kingston Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 0AA (020) 8394 2324

Provided and run by:
Ewell Orthodontics

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

13 September 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focussed inspection on 27 September 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following three questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Ewell Orthodontics is in Ewell and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes two orthodontists, three dental nurses, a dental hygienist and three receptionists. The practice has four treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a partnership and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Ewell Orthodontics is the principal orthodontist.

During the inspection we spoke with two orthodontists, three dental nurses and two receptionists. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

  • Monday 8.30 am to 5pm
  • Tuesday 8.30am to 6pm
  • Wednesday 7.30am to 4pm
  • Thursday 8.30am to 5pm
  • Friday 8am to 2.30pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Some appropriate life-saving equipment was not available.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff. However, improvements should be made to the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health file.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider should make improvements to the clinical fridge monitoring arrangements.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The provider should make improvements to the monitoring of outgoing referrals.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement an effective system for monitoring and recording the fridge temperature to ensure that medicines and dental care products are being stored in line with the manufacturer’s guidance.

  • Take action to ensure the availability of equipment in the practice to manage medical emergencies taking into account the guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the General Dental Council.

  • Improve the practice's processes for the control and storage of substances hazardous to health identified by the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, to ensure risk assessments are undertaken and the products are stored securely.

  • Implement a system to ensure patient referrals to other dental or health care professionals are centrally monitored to ensure they are received in a timely manner and not lost.

17 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We visited Ewell Orthodontics to look at the care and treatment provided to people who used the service. During our inspection we spoke with one person who used the service and four staff. We observed one treatment session and looked at four patient files.

The patient that spoke with us told us they were happy with the service provided and felt fully informed about the procedure.

Staff told us it was a very busy surgery with appointments for treatments now booked for December. We were told that consultations could be accommodated to discuss the treatment options available.

We saw that the practice had information available to patients in the waiting room. During consultations further information was provided to help them make an informed choice about the treatment.

We saw that medical histories were reviewed with each person before they received treatment. Treatment plans contained details of the treatment proposed, and what the person's decision had been

We saw that the practice was clean and well maintained. We observed good infection control procedures by staff.

Records of qualifications, criminal record checks and professional registrations were up to date.

The practice had not received a complaint but they told us they would be recorded and action would be taken to resolve them.