We carried out a review of the data available to us about Tremenheere Home Care on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Tremenheere Home Care, you can give feedback on this service.
Tremenheere registered as a new service on 15 June 2017. Consequently, this was their first inspection.
Tremenheere domiciliary care service provides services to people in their own homes in the Penzance and surrounding areas. It supports Older People, People living with Physical Disability and Sensory Impairment. The service mainly provides personal care for people in short visits at key times of the day to help people safely maintain their independence to live in their homes. The services were funded either privately or through Cornwall Council or NHS funding. The service employed approximately fifteen staff as well as having three office based managers.
At the time of the inspection approximately forty people were using the service. There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.
During this inspection, people and relatives told us they felt safe whilst using the service. One person said, “I trust the girls totally. I feel very safe when they visit me.” A relative said, “The staff are excellent. They are very competent.” Staff understood the importance of people’s safety and security. One staff member said, “It’s important we make sure clients feel safe. It’s their home we are going into and they need to be confident with us [staff].” Staff files confirmed staff had safeguarding training to protect people from poor care or abuse. Staff told us they knew how to respond to any concerns about abuse. One said, “Our training is up to date and its always spoken about at team meetings.”
The service used assistive technology to record peoples care needs. The care planning system provided staff with direction and guidance about how to meet people’s individual needs and wishes. Care plans were regularly reviewed and any changes in people’s needs were communicated to staff. Assessments were carried out to identify any risks to the person using the service and to the staff supporting them. This included any environmental risks in people’s homes and any risks in relation to the care and support needs of the person. People told us they were involved in decisions about their care and were aware of their care plans.
The registered manager used effective systems to record and report on, accidents and incidents and take action when required. In order to learn from events, the registered manager reviewed all incidents to make changes and where necessary to manage risks more effectively. Since registration in 2017 there had been a few minor incidents but none where changes had been required to mitigate those risks.
Staff records contained the necessary documentation of their recruitment to ensure they were suitable to work with vulnerable adults. We found staffing levels were sufficient and the service consistently deployed staff to meet people’s needs. A relative commented, “I like the fact we get a rota every week so we know who’s coming. If there is a change we are usually told so we know who to expect.”
Staff received ongoing training relevant to their role and supported by the registered manager. They had the skills, knowledge and experience required to support people in their care. A staff member told us, “There is always training to be done, whether it is online, in or out of office, and always support if we need it from senior management at any time required. If we wish to further our education, this is wholly encouraged by Beth, and she helps us sort out the right companies or levels we need to continue our learning journey.”
People’s care plans contained relevant information about assisting them with meal preparation. These were detailed to guide staff about the person’s nutritional needs and how to support them.
People’s feedback about their experience of the service was positive. People said staff treated them respectfully and asked them how they wanted their care and support to be provided. People told us they had their care visits as planned. Staff arrived on time and stayed for the allotted time. Nobody reported any missed visits. Comments included, “They [staff] are bright and willing and very helpful.
We found the management team had good oversight of care delivery through quality assurance systems. We saw action was taken to address identified issues and maintain everyone’s safety. Staff told us the management team were supportive and engaged well with them. A staff member said, “They both [registered manager and head of services] keep in regular contact when there are issues that need to be resolved and are proactive with identifying solutions and offers of help.”
. The assistive technological system being used monitored when visits were occurring which meant the management team ensured there were no missed calls. Late calls were identified using this system and the managers were then able to inform the following person so they were aware of the issue. One person told us, “They come when they say and they always let me know if they are going to be late.”
There was a complaints procedure which was made available to people on their admission to their relatives. People we spoke with told us they were happy and had no complaints.
The registered manager used a variety of methods to assess and monitor the quality of the service. These included regular audits, survey and staff meetings to seek their views about the service provided.